More lies? what do you think?
- Psychophanta
- Addict
- Posts: 4996
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
- Location: Lípetsk, Russian Federation
- Contact:
More lies? what do you think?
Please take the patient to watch and listen this one, and tell you opinion.
link removed
link removed
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com
While world=business:world+mafia:Wend
Will never leave this forum until the absolute bugfree PB
While world=business:world+mafia:Wend
Will never leave this forum until the absolute bugfree PB
Re: More lies? what do you think?
Fake, like many more around internet.
The only proposite of videos like this, is the monetization of the video itself.
The only proposite of videos like this, is the monetization of the video itself.
- NicTheQuick
- Addict
- Posts: 1226
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 7:43 pm
- Location: Germany, Saarbrücken
- Contact:
Re: More lies? what do you think?
There is no such thing like Free Energy. Just delete you thread and don't give these idiots even more views.
The english grammar is freeware, you can use it freely - But it's not Open Source, i.e. you can not change it or publish it in altered way.
Re: More lies? what do you think?
Ah finally, a Perpetuum Mobile.
PureBasic 6.04/XProfan X4a/Embarcadero RAD Studio 11/Perl 5.2/Python 3.10
Windows 11/Ryzen 5800X/32GB RAM/Radeon 7770 OC/3TB SSD/11TB HDD
Synology DS1821+/36GB RAM/130TB
Synology DS920+/20GB RAM/54TB
Synology DS916+ii/8GB RAM/12TB
Windows 11/Ryzen 5800X/32GB RAM/Radeon 7770 OC/3TB SSD/11TB HDD
Synology DS1821+/36GB RAM/130TB
Synology DS920+/20GB RAM/54TB
Synology DS916+ii/8GB RAM/12TB
- Psychophanta
- Addict
- Posts: 4996
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
- Location: Lípetsk, Russian Federation
- Contact:
Re: More lies? what do you think?
Well, the deep fact we all have in front of our noses is: There is no such thing like not Free Energy because every energy way in cosmos is really free, not free of cost, but just free. The situation is about its transformation and canalization, which requires a human dedication, and that's why it is not free of cost.
In other words: nobody should believe in the "maximum entrophy tendence", it is also a wrong theory.
Probably you all are very right all these kind of videos are scam: criminal in my understanding, if that is the case.
However, you should know that current consensum during decades before the Wright brothers, was the human being will never fly in the gas atmosphere. Wright brothers, for example, broke the scientific current consensus there was about the posibility of human to fly.
In other words: nobody should believe in the "maximum entrophy tendence", it is also a wrong theory.
Probably you all are very right all these kind of videos are scam: criminal in my understanding, if that is the case.
However, you should know that current consensum during decades before the Wright brothers, was the human being will never fly in the gas atmosphere. Wright brothers, for example, broke the scientific current consensus there was about the posibility of human to fly.
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com
While world=business:world+mafia:Wend
Will never leave this forum until the absolute bugfree PB
While world=business:world+mafia:Wend
Will never leave this forum until the absolute bugfree PB
Re: More lies? what do you think?
The fact is... in this machine you generate the electricity with a motor that drives the generator, so it's a closed loop, no matter what you do, the motor will stop because some of the power is lost, so you cannot produce more energy than is needed to produce it.
In my opinion, it is an insult to intelligence.
In my opinion, it is an insult to intelligence.
Re: More lies? what do you think?
the problem with this is resistance generates heat in all electronic circuits and heat is energy loss
▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░
Re: More lies? what do you think?
Exactly!
The perfect conversion without energy loss doesn't exists.
The perfect conversion without energy loss doesn't exists.
- NicTheQuick
- Addict
- Posts: 1226
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 7:43 pm
- Location: Germany, Saarbrücken
- Contact:
Re: More lies? what do you think?
Well, yes, it exists. You can create a LC circuit with superconductors which oscillates indefinitely. It constantly converts between an eletric and a magnetic field.
The english grammar is freeware, you can use it freely - But it's not Open Source, i.e. you can not change it or publish it in altered way.
Re: More lies? what do you think?
And... where do you get the energy to cool superconductors?NicTheQuick wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 1:38 pmWell, yes, it exists. You can create a LC circuit with superconductors which oscillates indefinitely. It constantly converts between an eletric and a magnetic field.
- NicTheQuick
- Addict
- Posts: 1226
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 7:43 pm
- Location: Germany, Saarbrücken
- Contact:
Re: More lies? what do you think?
That's the same question as: Where did you get the energy to magnetize the magnets in the motors he is using in the video.Caronte3D wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 2:14 pmAnd... where do you get the energy to cool superconductors?NicTheQuick wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 1:38 pmWell, yes, it exists. You can create a LC circuit with superconductors which oscillates indefinitely. It constantly converts between an eletric and a magnetic field.
The english grammar is freeware, you can use it freely - But it's not Open Source, i.e. you can not change it or publish it in altered way.
Re: More lies? what do you think?
Years ago I read exactly what this man is showing in this video in a technical magazine.
Including the explanation that the patent was bought by the rich oil industry and therefore the product will not come on the market...
I don't want to say that it's not possible. After all, you use extra energy from magnets, and that does exist.
So...why not ? I hope it works like he shows.
Including the explanation that the patent was bought by the rich oil industry and therefore the product will not come on the market...
I don't want to say that it's not possible. After all, you use extra energy from magnets, and that does exist.
So...why not ? I hope it works like he shows.
Yeah I know, but keep in mind ... Leonardo da Vinci was also an autodidact.
Re: More lies? what do you think?
Perpetual is relative. It only matters what you are willing to pay.
All motion in nature expends energy.
Marketing just paints it as magical when an engineer or scientist figures out a way to capture that energy without wires or fuel.
~~~
Consider the marketing when someone observes standard heat pump efficiency, but installed over a public sewer system with ~60F waste flowing by:
"Heat pumps do not operate as efficiently when temperatures drop between 25F-40F. They work best when temperatures are above 40F. Below 40F, heat pumps lose efficiency and consume more energy to deliver conditioned fluid or gas."
They would call it magic $hit!
All motion in nature expends energy.
Marketing just paints it as magical when an engineer or scientist figures out a way to capture that energy without wires or fuel.
~~~
Consider the marketing when someone observes standard heat pump efficiency, but installed over a public sewer system with ~60F waste flowing by:
"Heat pumps do not operate as efficiently when temperatures drop between 25F-40F. They work best when temperatures are above 40F. Below 40F, heat pumps lose efficiency and consume more energy to deliver conditioned fluid or gas."
They would call it magic $hit!
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
Re: More lies? what do you think?
The best free energy is have a field with trees, waste the less possible the heat, just cut the right quantity of trees for one year, and plant again new trees.
Also, in the oceans, the main molecul of water is H²O (2 on the bottom I know !).
But there is any molecul with a neutron in the core of the hydrogen atom : H + n => D (deuterium). Deuterium is one the isotops of the hydrogen, knowing an isotop of an atom is an atom which has or misses one or more neutrons : for nuclear referency, please see the "valley of the stability".
Picture source site
Isotops of an atom have the same electronic links as this atom.
That is why H²O molecul has a "sister" named "heavy water" and is symbolized as D²O.
There is such heavy water in the oceans to provides energy to the humankind during 4 billions of years !
The technological difficulty consists in the precision of the cast of 2 isotops of deuterium the one against the other, with the very accurate cinetic energy to get Helium atom and caloric rays.
It is like casting 2 pairs of bollocks the one against the the other, from the Earth the first pair and from Umuamua for the pair and get the energy which result far in the space in impact point tu use it. The risk, get radioactivity or get nothing if no accurate anymore.
The Z-machine is an example of this physical event, got by Laplace effect (electromagnetic field) from a very big electric pulse.
Picture source site
But let us imagine an object which produces 14000 times the initial energy, and let us imagine the energies minima level (electrical intensity and heat) is extremely high to get a useful energy.
It is actually very hard to find the right materials which resists to this. All is systematically destroyed on each test, as we would need to get a continuous converting.
Also, in the oceans, the main molecul of water is H²O (2 on the bottom I know !).
But there is any molecul with a neutron in the core of the hydrogen atom : H + n => D (deuterium). Deuterium is one the isotops of the hydrogen, knowing an isotop of an atom is an atom which has or misses one or more neutrons : for nuclear referency, please see the "valley of the stability".
Picture source site
Isotops of an atom have the same electronic links as this atom.
That is why H²O molecul has a "sister" named "heavy water" and is symbolized as D²O.
There is such heavy water in the oceans to provides energy to the humankind during 4 billions of years !
The technological difficulty consists in the precision of the cast of 2 isotops of deuterium the one against the other, with the very accurate cinetic energy to get Helium atom and caloric rays.
It is like casting 2 pairs of bollocks the one against the the other, from the Earth the first pair and from Umuamua for the pair and get the energy which result far in the space in impact point tu use it. The risk, get radioactivity or get nothing if no accurate anymore.
The Z-machine is an example of this physical event, got by Laplace effect (electromagnetic field) from a very big electric pulse.
Picture source site
But let us imagine an object which produces 14000 times the initial energy, and let us imagine the energies minima level (electrical intensity and heat) is extremely high to get a useful energy.
It is actually very hard to find the right materials which resists to this. All is systematically destroyed on each test, as we would need to get a continuous converting.
Re: More lies? what do you think?
Or do the opposite, living like Alice in wonderland
.oO( OMG another perpetuum mobile so coool ... wait, what did become of the previous 15 ones and why would we need another one if any of the previous ones actually worked longterm .... *insert wild global conspiracy theory involving big anonymous corporations supressing them* (wait this reminds me on hollywood movie plots like warehouse 13 ... meh )Oo.
waste of lifetime and big surprise - you wont get a minute back from YOUR wasted lifetime (so wont i for writing this
ps : experts know that this is not true, we can get our lifetime back and become immortal - just ask indiana jones