PureBasic Forums - English

Deleted

...and CJ is down with this port?

Of course, I did not understand exactly what you meant
Amsplugins used this component to build Some plugins for the autoplay media studio environment. like ribbonbar
Even indigorose company itself uses the controls of this component for output programs from autoplay media studio environment. like xButton,Skin and..
Did cj is down?
this is a common practice.

Looks very interesting. But where does that library come from?

Looks great!

Appears to be 32 bit only. Any idea on when the x64 version will be available?

X0r wrote:Looks very interesting. But where does that library come from?

I have a license from codejock suitepro. the way I use this component has nothing to do with codejock. If I share the original ActiveXs or work on a joint project with them, my license will be revoked. by the way, I do not transfer all the features of the components to AmitrisToolkit. this is no different from building a plugin for AutoPlay media studio. users who purchase a AutoPlay media studio license do not purchase another license from codejock to use the xbutton or skin in this environment.

blueb wrote:

Code: Select all

CompilerIf Not #PB_Compiler_Processor = #PB_Processor_x86
  
  MessageRequester("Compiler Error", "Example must be run using PureBasic's 32 bit compiler.", #MB_ICONERROR)
  End
  
CompilerEndIf

Looks great!

Appears to be 32 bit only. Any idea on when the x64 version will be available?

Thanks, coming soon.

I have a license from codejock suitepro. the way I use this component has nothing to do with codejock. If I share the original ActiveXs or work on a joint project with them, my license will be revoked. by the way, I do not transfer all the features of the components to AmitrisToolkit. this is no different from building a plugin for AutoPlay media studio. users who purchase a AutoPlay media studio license do not purchase another license from codejock to use the xbutton or skin in this environment.

Are you really sure that this is not just a wrapper for some of the functions of the codejock library?

X0r wrote:Are you really sure that this is not just a wrapper for some of the functions of the codejock library?

I have no claim to build change skin library.I also have no claim to add more libraries in the future for AmitrisToolkit. I have been an AutoPlay user before. this method of developing and adding features to autoplay is common. If I had written this library, I would have published the pb source, not a .dll, Did you get your answer?

I doubt that codejock will be very happy about you giving away their product (even though partly) to the whole PB community (and every other programming language with dll support) for free, with only one sold license. Yours!
Don't get me wrong here, I'd like to have a solid skinning solution for PB as much as you do, but it should also be a legit one. Could you please check that with codejock first? Also for your own sake

Okay, I'll stop it now.

Thanks chi, that was exactly my point...

X0r wrote:Thanks chi, that was exactly my point...

Maybe I was wrong, but I'm definitely talking to codejock about it.
If your point is correct :
I know people and companies who have such violations and I can report them.I also have to pay the fine myself.

Thanks.

“ (d) Make and distribute copies of the Object Code of the Software as incorporated into software application products that you develop provided that the Software, or other Codejock Software© products, do not constitute a major portion of the value of your product;”

If anyone, it should be Fred making some kind of deal with a gui toolkit, maybe an commercial addon package, ofcourse cross platform. PB’s GUI toolkit is indeed very basic and lacks many cross platform features one would expect (especially lack of any buildin column and row handling).