Page 1 of 1

I think what we need is PureBasic code in Stack Overflow

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 5:16 pm
by normeus
If we had more people posting questions in Stack Overflow, I think we would have a larger comunity.
and we all could use this book: :mrgreen: ( no need to read the PureBasic help )

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+codeprojec ... NLbKUvHSbW

:wink:

I know I do it all the time for C++ , PHP , HTML, etc.. :D


( This is a joke but it's lost in translation )

Norm

Re: I think what we need is PureBasic code in Stack Overflow

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 7:50 pm
by Lunasole
I like that designed for true professional programmers book ^^

Also I'm posting sometime Purebasic related stuff on external resources , but it often leaded to flame & flood :mrgreen:
Because It is hard for the typical "professional" codemonkey look at something having "basic" in its name, even if it is a pseudo-basic like PB. Just those who like C sometimes liked PB too (though, often saying "it lacks of ARM support", "not an open-source", "no optimizations like GCC does", etc), but most of ppl cannot even just try it to examine any advantages. Well, prejudices and stereotypes are their problem.

Re: I think what we need is PureBasic code in Stack Overflow

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 8:58 pm
by tj1010
I'd actually like to see statistics made only from programmers who have finished projects regarding language market share.. I have a feeling they'd surprise some people..