Page 1 of 1
procedure overloading
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 3:06 pm
by seeker
it would be nice to have procedure overloading. one wouldn't need to come up with stupid name for procedures that basically to do the same, but have a slightly different signature.
i am asking NOT for OOP here.
Re: procedure overloading
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 5:48 pm
by luis
Re: procedure overloading
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 5:53 pm
by Tenaja
seeker wrote:...one wouldn't need to come up with stupid name...
Until this is implemented, you may consider using PB's naming method.
I agree this naming method may not be a perfect solution, however, it provides consistency and also avoids complications that overloading present.
PeekA
PeekB
PeekC
PeekD
PeekF
PeekI
PeekL
PeekQ
PeekS
PeekU
PeekW
PokeA
PokeB
PokeC
PokeD
PokeF
PokeI
PokeL
PokeQ
PokeS
PokeU
PokeW