PureBasic Forums - English

Real story .... hehehe

I am a job seeker that have lost their jobs, more than 10 years.

Programmer so fall in document screening, I was aiming to novelist.
But, novel contest fell. After making music player software with relieve stress,
I have achieved the world's top sound quality.

Why?

My technology, OGG sound source is over sound quality of SACD.　 　 　

then your software price is $ 20,000 over !!! from Japanese audiophiles

How about your opinion, please

> I have achieved the world's top sound quality

According to who? You can't make that claim yourself.
You need peers in the industry to confirm such a claim.

Thanks for your opinion.
I see. my father said "You will hear many it, but you should stop in your mind."

JPLAY, J RIVER, Foobar2000 are bad sound's music player.... I don't belive.
But Facebook page add Like's, increased.

I think it would be wording of support.

oryaaaaa wrote:I am a job seeker that have lost their jobs, more than 10 years.

Programmer so fall in document screening, I was aiming to novelist.
But, novel contest fell. After making music player software with relieve stress,
I have achieved the world's top sound quality.
...
then your software price is $ 20,000 over !!! from Japanese audiophiles

Hi oryaaaaa. I think congratulations should be in order; I'm sure that you've created a quality product.

However, I'm a little confused about some other details in your post:
- Do you mean to say that you have been jobless for more than 10 years?
- And were you trying to be a novelist, but without success?
- What do you mean your software price is $20,000 over?

Just like to understand.

PB wrote:> I have achieved the world's top sound quality

According to who? You can't make that claim yourself.
You need peers in the industry to confirm such a claim.

I agree. AFAIK, oryaaaaa uses the BASS audio library, so any other software that uses BASS could make the same claim.

Hi, thank you for your opinion.

I paid BASS shareware licence $300 over.
Because I thanks to developers of BASS, I bought this number.
Not a claim.

[Job History]
before job seeker for programmer
1993...1994 DOS/V based PC shop, Sub manager
before job seeker for programmer
1995 Telephone devices manufactor ... sales man
before job seeker for programmer
1996...2001 SCREEN (DTP, CTP, MacOS7 8 9, Solaris, etc)
before job seeker for programmer
2002 Scuba diver training for instructor (NAUI)
before job seeker for programmer
2002 ... 2013 now Unemployed

[Novel]
Many haters attacked to me

[$20,000]
I use audio by $7,000.
but many bug head users use by $40,000.
There is no work. The SCREEN, everyone do not know in my city.

Hi oryaaaaa. Very inspiring! Hang in there my friend; perseverance pays.

It probably not important how technically good a program or product is, but more the approach of the marketing to get popularity on social networking sites, there are plenty of crap stuff that gets a high notoriety, especially if it is stupid, simply because of popularity level, this goes with all products nowadays.

I still don´t understand why anyone should buy your program for 20k$. for whom is your program? A small user won´t pay 20k$ or is your target recording Studios?

I don't understand what this program should do since you have not explained it. Should this enhance the quality of an MP3 or OGG file "up to the quality of an SACD" ?
Because if that's what you are saying it's simply not possible to add audio data out of the thin air to replace the nuances now missing in a MP3/OGG but present in the original sound. It's like wanting to restore a JPEG back to the original image. What it's gone is gone.
A program like that, if working, would be glorified everywhere on the internet in no time.

It seem it's not the case from what I see:
http://ocremix.org/forums/showthread.ph ... 027&page=2
I admit they does not look as a smart bunch, but anyway they don't seem to notice all this "enhancement" and I didn't find someone talking enthusiastically about it.

If we are talking instead about subjective "audio beautification" to make it more appealing to certain individuals, especially with poor speakers and/or poor taste then there are a lot of commercial audio enhancers, one well known is the audio crystalizer for creative labs. It works pretty well and when tuned to light action the result is pleasing with many type of music, if you like what it does.

Here are some info about it: http://ixbtlabs.com/articles2/multimedi ... part2.html

I tried an old version of your program (maybe one year ago ?) and I didn't notice any subjective improvement of the sound, maybe I didn't use it correctly, but it looked very easy to use so I have little doubts. It should at least have some usage documentation and some background detailing what it is supposed to do with the audio input... and a LOT of enthusiastic followers before proclaiming a similar achievement.

Last option I can think of, maybe this is still another thing dedicated only to mid to hi cost pre and ampli and it's using oversample or upsample or maybe both to make their DACs work at a higher frequencies with some possible benefit in the filtering section (you can more easily filter higher frequencies). Even in that case (I cannot test it) I believe the impact would be negligible. And the source audio wouldn't be improved, just reproduced somewhat better on some specific hardware.