http://www.purebasic.com
https://www.purebasic.fr/english/
Buy an SSD instead. My machine loads 400 preferences into a structure and a 3.2MB file into 222 distinct PB arrays in under 600 milliseconds. Who needs progress bars?Inf0Byt3 wrote:It would be great if the team had the time to implement a small progressbar in the statusbar of the IDE for use when loading big source files. It would make the IDE more responsive. This isn't a big issue, as the IDE is already fast - takes only 2-3 seconds to load a 800kb source, but it would make it look a bit better. Thanks.
Sure, but the hard-disk isn't the bottleneck herenospam wrote: Buy an SSD instead. My machine loads 400 preferences into a structure and a 3.2MB file into 222 distinct PB arrays in under 600 milliseconds. Who needs progress bars?
. If anything, it's the CPU (probably related to Scintilla parsing the code, highlighting it, etc.). My request is related to the way PureBasic behaves while loading the source, the fact that it doesn't respond, not the fact that it takes x amount of time to load it.Oh, yes, I forgot about that. I also have an Intel i7-3770 CPU.Inf0Byt3 wrote:nospam wrote:Sure, but the hard-disk isn't the bottleneck here
To make sure that you always had a reminder right in front of your face that you needed to upgrade your hardware.And then why did Microsoft add progressbars in their IDEs?
