PureBasic Forums - English

Hi to all.
Physics just made a breakthrough in magnetism with programmable magnets.

Magnetism now can be used in a recursive way starting to drive itself. This opens
the door to selfrunning machines and overunity. This is not perpetuum mobile
and this is also not breaking the second law of thermodynamics.

This is thinking outside of the box, now coming with results.
(It also proves that professor Searl after all is not a mad scientist)

Here is proof :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bK0Obzay ... r_embedded


In this field I invite you all to have a look at the website of Dan Winter who is starting
a revolution in science and technology. Where Einstein ended, Dan Winter is continuing,
leaving quantum mechanics behind with it's flaws and limitations and replacing it with
it's successor : the mechanics of the wave.

http://www.goldenmean.info

This website is a bit chaotic at first but just hang around for a couple of minutes
and you will sure find something that grabs your interest.

This is not spam and this is not going to waste your time.
Greetings as always
cw

As far as I can see someone is trying to patent all this (see the links in your video)?

codewalker wrote:Magnetism now can be used in a recursive way starting to drive itself. This opens
the door to selfrunning machines and overunity.

But can anyone prove such a device?
People have made these since the 80's but all we got are fishy YouTube videos.
I'm not saying that it isn't possible, either this is "kept from hitting the mainstream" or there just isn't any such devices.

A first glance of that website only brings one thing to mind: TIME CUBE!!!11one

The simple proof against it: http://www.xkcd.com/808/

The speed of light is JUST the speed of light (and even that can be broken inversely as we have een with scientists freezing photons in their tracks!) I have never considered 186,001 to be impossible... I don't think Einstein did at the end... he did write something about if there was no upper limit to the speeds you could achieve than the universe was doomed to run out of energy... Think he was wrong about that too!!!

Not saying he wasn't an incredibly smart dude! Just saying he was not a God. He was human and that by definitio makes him capable of error... the more brilliant, the greater the possible error!

One of my prefessors inn college went to Princeton for his masters way back in the early 1950's he would sit on a small bench on campus waiting for his girlfriend to gett out of her psychology class (assuming it was not snowing) and there wass an old groundskeeper usually nearby sweeping the leavess off the sidewalk with a broom... he didn't recognize Einstein at first... but the man swept with humor and patience muttering in German now and again... occasionally stopping to scribble something in a notebook. Dr. Hader told me he never said anything other than "hello" to the man but it was always nicely returned...

Consider that Einsteins theory esssentially relies on having 4 dimensions (which was not an unusual idea at the time but the first time it had been mathematically woven into a concept.

Towards the end of his life the idea that 10 dimensions had been colapsed into 4 started growing stronger... Einstein would not hear of it at first... if so his ideas would have to be reexamined... But he was grappling with it to his last days... I think if he had lived a while longer we would have had a new theory...

Programmable magnets are true... The applications of them have yet to be explored but it is NOT sticky tape only. I have seen them and handled them at Rice University in Houston. there WAS resistance and then acceptance... if you jiggled them though the resistance returned... almost as though the attraction was slipped through holes in the field... and then when you wiggled it the holes slipped out of phase and it popped back to repulsion.

Several students had ideas about engines using this tech... those engines could gnerate the electricity to provide power to run their engine... that WOULD be a form of perpetual motion... but there would ALWAYS bee some loss due to friction... unless they made MUCH more power than they needed...

Time will tell whats right or wrong... I can only hope I am here to geek out about it!!!