PureBasic Forums - English

Now that we've got the ability to use lists in maps...
Perhaps it would be a good idea to make a few list implementations

SLL -vector (allocated on each add)
DDL -vector

SLL Block (allocated in blocks)
DLL Block

Reason I ask is that I was using the lists to abstract the map to make chains and ended up with a process memory usage of 1gb vs 3.5mb for the same with a SSL vector.

The standard library can't be perfect for every scenario. If you have special needs, just write your own functions.

Besidest that, i don't think i understand a word you're saying anyway

I was talking about abstracting a map to make a chained hash table

map Items
A -> list items
B -> list items

Besidest that, i don't think i understand a word you're saying anyway

Oh good so it's not just me! I was starting to worry.. no offfense idle

Please add me to the wtf is he talking about club!

(Again, no offence idle!)

no probably not talking the same language, "in your own word please describe" key words being "own words"
Don't you think it'd be a positive step for the language to facilitate a more complete list library considering that we can now mash things together?