Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2002 11:21 pm
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by tinman.
Hi,
Probably a question to Fred, unless someone else knows for sure. Is it safe to use any kind of integer number for the memory number? Like, if I use 999999999 then only that memory bank will be created, and not, eg. an array to hold 1000000000 pointers to memory areas.
And for the person who always asks why (there's always one) I'm creating bank numbers on the fly, using the address of where I'm storing the pointer to the memory as the number.
Thanks.
--
It's not minimalist - I'm increasing efficiency by reducing input effort.
(Win98first ed. + SP1, PB3.20)
Hi,
Probably a question to Fred, unless someone else knows for sure. Is it safe to use any kind of integer number for the memory number? Like, if I use 999999999 then only that memory bank will be created, and not, eg. an array to hold 1000000000 pointers to memory areas.
And for the person who always asks why (there's always one) I'm creating bank numbers on the fly, using the address of where I'm storing the pointer to the memory as the number.
Thanks.
--
It's not minimalist - I'm increasing efficiency by reducing input effort.
(Win98first ed. + SP1, PB3.20)