Posted: Wed May 01, 2002 1:34 am
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by tinman.
Hi, I just got bitten by the old "includebinary needs the full pathname" bug (seems it was reported around 2.70) - is this planned to be fixed for v3.1?
--
It's not minimalist - I'm increasing efficiency by reducing input effort.
Hi, I just got bitten by the old "includebinary needs the full pathname" bug (seems it was reported around 2.70) - is this planned to be fixed for v3.1?
--
It's not minimalist - I'm increasing efficiency by reducing input effort.