http://www.purebasic.com
https://www.purebasic.fr/english/
It would be a pity! Pandas are sooo cute...ricardo wrote:Delete Panda from your PC
A Antivirus Program, so good that you can never work on your pcKiffi wrote:P.S.: What is Panda?
jaPBe.exe is packed with PECompact2, hence the (false) alarm I guess ...KIKI wrote:I have a problem with Panda and Japbe
Japbe freeze when i open the procedure About.... if i desactviate Panda JAPBE works well.
Has somone had this problem ? if yes how did it solve it
Panda is most probably the largest scientology company in the worldKiffi wrote:What is Panda?
From PECompact website :blueznl wrote:One of the things that keeps puzzling me is this drive for packed executables. I can understand you want the installable to be as small as possible, but why would you pack an executable? Isn't that slowing down loading and execution of the program?
Why would one want to compress an executable/module?
There are many reasons. One of the most common is that compression offers an inherent degree of tamper resistance and obfuscation. Another is that since the usual compression ratio is greater than 70% (that is, the compressed file is 30% of the original), larger executables and modules may load much quicker from the network or disk hosting them. Since storage medium is often the largest bottleneck in overall system performance, the time spent decompressing can be much less than the time saved by not having to load as much data from the storage medium.
Add tamper resistance.
Obfuscate and help deter reverse engineering.
Compression is typically 70% or greater on large files, far better than popular file compression software. This is because compression is targeted to a specific file/data format.
Load time can be improved by having a smaller image to load from the storage medium (disk, network, etc..).
They key word here is 'may'...may load
It doesn't slow down loading, in fact it loads faster because the byte size on disk is so much smaller. And on USB sticks this smaller speed makes it load and run WAY faster. Unpacking is usually around 99% of realtime speed, so it's no big deal. Packing = good.blueznl wrote:One of the things that keeps puzzling me is this drive for packed executables. I can understand you want the installable to be as small as possible, but why would you pack an executable? Isn't that slowing down loading and execution of the program?
