Page 1 of 3
PropertyViewer [canceled]
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:38 pm
by Fluid Byte
Alright, I finally hacked something together wich I think is worth releasing now. I tried to implement item folding the whole weekend but I failed totally. Anyhow I promised to release the source either it's done or not. So here it is but it's anything else than complete (for my personal taste). It's still missing item folding and keyboard navigation. But what it does up to now, it does fairly good and should be enough for most people.
Screenshot:
Ok, the demo code goes first:
Please test this intensely and report any bugs so I can improve this ASAP.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:38 pm
by Fluid Byte
October 16, 2007:
- fixed a memory leak
Content of
PropertyViewer.pbi:
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:45 pm
by rsts
Wow.
First class Mr Byte.
Thanks for sharing.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:31 pm
by milan1612
Woohoo, finally!
Big thanks to you!
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:51 pm
by srod
Very nice indeed.
Thanks.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 8:57 pm
by DoubleDutch
Thanks
Maybe the problems you encountered just need a pair of fresh eyes. Sometimes when you look at code a lot it gets hard to see something that may be obvious.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:40 pm
by Droopy
Usefull, thanks
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:00 am
by nicolaus
Very nice but i cant compile your example.
I have a IMA in the Procedure "PROV_AddParent()" at the line " *prvp = AllocateMemory(SizeOf(PROV_PARENT)) ".
I work with Windows XP SP2 (without XP Style) and PB 4.02
regards,
Nico
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:15 am
by milan1612
Strange, I have exactly the same configuration and it compiles without problems...
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:37 am
by Fluid Byte
Nicolaus, wich PB Version do you use? I use the latest Beta 4 for testing.
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:06 pm
by byo
Wow, this is amazing!
And a great PB study!
I've been looking for something like this.
Thanks a lot for this contribution!
.
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:12 pm
by #NULL
@fluid byte
4.02, he said.
i tried with 4.02 too. no problems. same system as nicolaus.
< captious: >
i cant compile your example.
I have a IMA
that's contradictory.
so you can compile, but it doesn't run as it should.
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:58 pm
by dontmailme
Nice
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:51 pm
by byo
So maybe some of the pros here can help improve the code by adding item folding and keyboard navigation as mentioned?
.
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:56 pm
by Fluid Byte
byo wrote:So maybe some of the pros here can help improve the code by adding item folding and keyboard navigation as mentioned?
They can't because my code is hard to read.
I hate it anyway if other peeps mess around with the code and release changes wich I can't reproduce in detail. So no worries. I will integrate item folding (and possible bugfixes) as soon as possible. So the user don't have be concerned about anything but hitting F5.