I just figured that since we have a community that's good at participating, if the web version of the help file could be made into a wiki then people here could update them and add code snippets or perf comments to them or help with a few lines of text to help noobs avoid pitfalls. PB would still be able to administor them but it could save them some effort in bulking up their docs.
For more control perhaps they might not let everyone do it but but just people they know who aren't likely to make a mess.
We'd be able to participate more in PB without getting in the way of the building of the core product.
The docs would be more of a living doc that becomes more up to date all the time if bugs are discovered.
Anyway, can't hurt to suggest it.
Wiki the help files
Wiki the help files
Paul Dwyer
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
- netmaestro
- PureBasic Bullfrog
- Posts: 8451
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:42 am
- Location: Fort Nelson, BC, Canada
There was a PureWiki page already set up, but nobody really used it. The link
is found at PureArea: http://www.purearea.net/pb/english/index.htm
Sadly, the link is no longer working, but maybe it can be restored, along with
what little contributions were there originally?
is found at PureArea: http://www.purearea.net/pb/english/index.htm
Sadly, the link is no longer working, but maybe it can be restored, along with
what little contributions were there originally?
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
There's a "Manual" link on that page but its just a link, not wiki'd.
I suppose that if Fred & Co don't have time we could try and set it up ourselves but it'd be nice with their moderation and support.
Depends if they see any value to it I suppose
I suppose that if Fred & Co don't have time we could try and set it up ourselves but it'd be nice with their moderation and support.
Depends if they see any value to it I suppose
Paul Dwyer
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
> There's a "Manual" link on that page but its just a link, not wiki'd
No, under that "Manual" link is a link called "PureWiki", which leads to:
http://www.purearea.net/pb/english/purewiki/index.php
But it's down. Here's what it used to look like when working:
http://web.archive.org/web/200611300437 ... /Main_Page
As you can see, it was a true working Wiki, with editable pages and so on.
No, under that "Manual" link is a link called "PureWiki", which leads to:
http://www.purearea.net/pb/english/purewiki/index.php
But it's down. Here's what it used to look like when working:
http://web.archive.org/web/200611300437 ... /Main_Page
As you can see, it was a true working Wiki, with editable pages and so on.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Looks pretty cool.
If PB did a major version upgrade though I guess a lot of this would become out of date overnight. That would be very de motivating if you'd made a big effort.
I suppose if PB then took the wiki and built their doc from it and then used that doc to propulate a new helpfile wiki for the new version it might work but it's starting to become a big ask for them.
I can't help but think the forum would be a good resource for them in improving their docs. (wiki or no).
If PB did a major version upgrade though I guess a lot of this would become out of date overnight. That would be very de motivating if you'd made a big effort.
I suppose if PB then took the wiki and built their doc from it and then used that doc to propulate a new helpfile wiki for the new version it might work but it's starting to become a big ask for them.
I can't help but think the forum would be a good resource for them in improving their docs. (wiki or no).
Paul Dwyer
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
I'm not a wiki expoert but I think there's ways that keep track of changes so if you:
- Start with the base docs
- Limit access
- just watch the changes going in.
You would have control and docs would expand.
I'm not sure that it would work for the forum people to embark on their own set of docs by themselves.
Anyway, it was just an idea. Perhaps someone else has another idea that makes this (or something like it) more feasable.
- Start with the base docs
- Limit access
- just watch the changes going in.
You would have control and docs would expand.
I'm not sure that it would work for the forum people to embark on their own set of docs by themselves.
Anyway, it was just an idea. Perhaps someone else has another idea that makes this (or something like it) more feasable.
Paul Dwyer
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
PureWiki is repaired, some problems with a table
http://www.purearea.net/pb/english/purewiki/index.php
http://www.purearea.net/pb/english/purewiki/index.php
PureBasic 5.73 | SpiderBasic 2.30 | Windows 10 Pro (x64) | Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

That actually looks pretty good!
I'm going to have a longer look at it.
I'm going to have a longer look at it.
Paul Dwyer
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein