Page 1 of 1
[Implemented] Defined(...) with #PB_Label
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:06 pm
by Leonhard
Why does Defined(...) not assisted #PB_Label?
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:53 pm
by Kaeru Gaman
because a label is nothing that is defined?
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:10 pm
by Trond
Because PB doesn't keep track of labels, it just passes them on to fasm.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:20 pm
by Fred
PB does track the labels (to perform syntax checks).
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:52 pm
by Trond
Did it always do that?
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:24 pm
by Kaeru Gaman
even if implemented...
Defined() would only recon labels in the above code, not in the following.
like it is with constants and all other things.
perhaps this is a reason why it's not implemented, because labels are moreoften at the end of the code, in opposite to constants and stuff...