Page 1 of 1
[Implemented] Big numbers and unlimited strings
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 7:33 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by PB.
These two features are needed badly and I feel should be a priority.
Lack of large numbers = we can't do things like FileSize on big files,
or add up the total size of a directory of big files; and strings being
only 64k has problems like GetClipboardText crashing your app (fatally)
if the clipboard is >64k. Please consider making these a priority
when you get back, Fred. Thanks.
PB - Registered PureBasic Coder
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 9:01 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by plouf.
a nice idea about string would be to be dimmed
ie
string.s = "bla",4 ; make astring 4 bytes+null
string.s = "bla" ; default aka 64k
string.s = "bla",-1 ; auto dim in 3 bytes+null
Christos
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 9:34 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Berikco.
Yep, doubles and unlimited strings are needed badly...
Regards,
Berikco
http://www.benny.zeb.be
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2002 6:42 am
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Danilo.
YES for Doubles, Quads, Macros and unlimited Strings.
(i think Fred will add all this for v4.0 -> 4.0 = Compiler-rewrite)
cya,
...Danilo
(registered PureBasic user)
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2002 11:57 am
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by tranquil.
Originally posted by Danilo
YES for Doubles, Quads, Macros and unlimited Strings.
(i think Fred will add all this for v4.0 -> 4.0 = Compiler-rewrite)
Compiler rewrite for 4.0?? oh dear! Lets begin from 1.0 again.
But I agree, unlimited Strings and (much much much much more importend) Quads and Doubles are strongy required!!!
Mike
Tranquilizer/ Secretly!
http://www.secretly.de
Registred PureBasic User
System: Windows 2000 Server, 512 MB Ram, GeForce4200 TI 128 MB DDR, Hercules Theater 6.1 DTS Sound
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2002 12:19 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by TheBeck.
My vote is for 64 and 80 bit math, and unlimited string length.
EDIT: Oh, and while we are on the 64bit topic, any plans for x86-64?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2002 1:35 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by gnozal.
I definitly vote for unlimited strings and double precision floats !
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2002 5:35 am
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Jondo.
I Vote for adding bug numbers too, Floats and QWord or 64 bit, but i dont mind it will be a Cardinal Variable (which can be a nice temp solution) its 32 bit but its the unsigned value
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2002 8:00 am
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by fweil.
...,
May I suggest one thing ... not bug numbers please, just big.
Really sorry for this.
Francois Weil
14, rue Douer
F64100 Bayonne
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2002 9:48 am
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Berikco.
ROFL
Regards,
Berikco
http://www.benny.zeb.be
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:16 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Jondo.
LOL come on gimme a break I is near O