Page 1 of 3
@Fred: Any info about the delivery of first PB 4.0 beta ???
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 10:54 am
by IceSoft
@Fred,
I belive:
PB4.0 should be release as a full version before the christmas days are been here.
And we should no longer wait for a first beta.
The stabilation process of the PB4.0 will be need also a few weeks.
And we have only 6 weeks before christmas is here.
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 11:07 am
by Polo
C'mon, don't put the pressure on Fred
I'm really waiting for the alpha channel loading in images, I hope Fred didn't forget to add it
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 11:32 am
by IceSoft
Polo wrote:C'mon, don't put the pressure on Fred
Pressure is one of the method to get a great result from a sw developer.
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 11:35 am
by Polo
IceSoft wrote:Pressure is one of the method to get a great result from a sw developer.
And I must admit PB4.0 would be a REALLY nice Christmas' present
!
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:01 pm
by IceSoft
Polo wrote:IceSoft wrote:Pressure is one of the method to get a great result from a sw developer.
And I must admit PB4.0 would be a REALLY nice Christmas' present
!
Oh no! You are not right! Not a nice present!
* It will be the best one. *
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 1:55 pm
by rsts
IceSoft wrote:Pressure is one of the method to get a great result from a sw developer.
Ever heard of "good, fast, cheap - pick any two"?
Well it's already free (the upgrade) or very inexpensive to purchase, and I'd like it to be "good".
cheers
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 3:46 pm
by gpetersz
rsts wrote:IceSoft wrote:Pressure is one of the method to get a great result from a sw developer.
Ever heard of "good, fast, cheap - pick any two"?
Well it's already free (the upgrade) or very inexpensive to purchase, and I'd like it to be "good".
cheers
I can just second it.
Hands off from Fred!
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:04 pm
by dracflamloc
Whats with the xmas deadline people seem to think exists?
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:12 pm
by Num3
You can't rush perfection ...
It will be done, when it's done !
OH!OH!OH!
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:13 pm
by rsts
dracflamloc wrote:Whats with the xmas deadline people seem to think exists?
Some comment from the interview with Fred.
38. How do you see the future of PureBasic yourself, i.e. short-term (2005/2006), medium-term (within 2-3 years) and long-term (5-10 years)?
Short-term: release the v4 for Windows, probably before the end of the year. Then doing the v4 version for Linux and OS X.
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:20 pm
by thefool
I have the correct answer:
Between the 11. november 2005 and 11. november 2008!
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:35 pm
by Trond
rsts wrote:Short-term: release the v4 for Windows, probably before the end of the year. Then doing the v4 version for Linux and OS X.
They'll have to delay the end of the year then.
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:48 pm
by rsts
Short term was listed as 2005/2006, so it would appear he has another 13 months
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:33 pm
by remi_meier
I would like to see a beta of the compiler without the libs! We could find
the compiler bugs much easier cause we know that they're not in the libraries!
I really don't want more libs, just a cool compiler! I can wait for additional
functions and libs.
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:52 pm
by Trond
remi_meier wrote:I would like to see a beta of the compiler without the libs! We could find
the compiler bugs much easier cause we know that they're not in the libraries!
I really don't want more libs, just a cool compiler! I can wait for additional
functions and libs.
Hmm, PureBasic wouldn't run very good without the libs. How could we watch what our program did without windows, requesters, file output or console output?