Page 1 of 2

Shell

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:47 pm
by Polo
Hi !
I was just wondering, would it be possible to do a complete Windows shell replacement in Purebasic ?
I mean, to be able to just delete the windows' explorer.exe, and create our own, so the startmenu, the desktop and all would be managed in our PB's exe ??
I would be quite cool to do that :)

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 8:48 pm
by Trond
Yes. (But I wouldn't recommend trying)

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:58 pm
by netmaestro
Is the wheel not quite round enough for you? It should be reinvented?

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 12:28 am
by Fred
funny enough, i had started such a project :)

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:58 am
by Rescator
Hmm! I'm sure there is a lot o bloat in Microsoft's Shell, so a custom one might end up using less memory and cpu etc.

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 12:32 pm
by Polo
Fred wrote:funny enough, i had started such a project :)
What was the result ? Can we see what you've done ? I'm quite interested in that ;)

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 12:33 pm
by Polo
Rescator wrote:Hmm! I'm sure there is a lot o bloat in Microsoft's Shell, so a custom one might end up using less memory and cpu etc.
Well, you also forgot that the Microsoft's shell was buggy :)

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 12:34 pm
by Polo
netmaestro wrote:Is the wheel not quite round enough for you? It should be reinvented?
With that kind of mind, Linux is useless, Purebasic is useless, etc...

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 12:45 pm
by thefool
Polo wrote:
netmaestro wrote:Is the wheel not quite round enough for you? It should be reinvented?
With that kind of mind, Linux is useless, Purebasic is useless, etc...
Yes :P

Actually my opinion is: If you could do a BETTER wheel, why not reinvent it?
If you make a light shell, wich used very little memory and didnt take much cpu power i would use it when creating music for example.

Btw is there already such VERY light but anyway beautiful shell?

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 12:49 pm
by Polo
Well, I'm sure there is already very good shells, but doing a shell in Purebasic would be exciting, wouldn't it :wink:
And the fact it would be written in Pure would do that the shell would be unbloated (how could a Pure program could be bloated :)), stable and fast :) !

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 12:54 pm
by PB
> is there already such VERY light but anyway beautiful shell?

I don't know about "light" but Talisman Desktop (not free) looks very nice:

http://www.lighttek.com/talisman.htm
http://www.lighttek.com/images/t2.jpg

:shock:

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:00 pm
by thefool
Polo wrote:Well, I'm sure there is already very good shells, but doing a shell in Purebasic would be exciting, wouldn't it :wink:
And the fact it would be written in Pure would do that the shell would be unbloated (how could a Pure program could be bloated :)), stable and fast :) !
True its a brilliant idea :)

@PB:
I agree those screenshots looks nice! But it definently doesnt look light :)

free shells @ nonags.com :
http://ftp.sunet.se/nonags/deskshell.html

geoshell looks real nice!
http://www.geoshell.com/ (free)

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:05 pm
by Polo
PB : your screenshot does look nice, but this is what I call bloated :)
There's some really nice idea, I like the bar at the top, with Log Off / Turn Off (why should be push "Start" in the aim of shutting down the computer :) ?)
But actually on this screenshot I don't like the right panel which look useless and takes all the place, and I prefer having a "real" desktop :)

Anyway, I would be really amazed to see what Fred has done on this 8)

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:14 pm
by thefool
Polo wrote:PB : your screenshot does look nice, but this is what I call bloated :)
There's some really nice idea, I like the bar at the top, with Log Off / Turn Off (why should be push "Start" in the aim of shutting down the computer :) ?)
But actually on this screenshot I don't like the right panel which look useless and takes all the place, and I prefer having a "real" desktop :)

Anyway, I would be really amazed to see what Fred has done on this 8)
True :)
I guess i want a kind of shell, that JUST have a right click menu and a systray hehe.. For file managing totalcommander is okay and that is a seperate program!

SO fred tell what you have done so far :)

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:19 pm
by Dare2
Come on now Fred, please don't be slow!
Out with your shell - we wanna know!
Up with link, download (to applause)
We'll show respect if you show us yours!