Some thoughts about PureBasic
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 5:59 pm
Hi all,
I just wanted to share a few thoughts I had about PB. First off, I love that PB can create wrappers for stuff that is written in C so easily. The prime example are the C headers I've translated into PB with little effort and have had them work very well. Under win32 allot of the API support is really top notch. Rarely must I find the DLL or what not that the API call is in and use it directly most of the time something_ works fine. I'm telling you though PB was a bit expensive for me at least, I don't regret buying it at all. All basics should be like PB. As far as I'm concerned PB is the only basic that got its stuff right. I love the small and fast exe code it produces ans best of all true 100% standalone. Thats something you don't see so much these days. Especially with .NET and such relying on frameworks a user has to download and install. Which personally I think is a shame. Either way great job Fred, keep it up.
I just wanted to share a few thoughts I had about PB. First off, I love that PB can create wrappers for stuff that is written in C so easily. The prime example are the C headers I've translated into PB with little effort and have had them work very well. Under win32 allot of the API support is really top notch. Rarely must I find the DLL or what not that the API call is in and use it directly most of the time something_ works fine. I'm telling you though PB was a bit expensive for me at least, I don't regret buying it at all. All basics should be like PB. As far as I'm concerned PB is the only basic that got its stuff right. I love the small and fast exe code it produces ans best of all true 100% standalone. Thats something you don't see so much these days. Especially with .NET and such relying on frameworks a user has to download and install. Which personally I think is a shame. Either way great job Fred, keep it up.