Page 1 of 1
Process Library released (another one)
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 3:51 pm
by Rings
As Part of my forthcoming PurePowerPack i took out this library and release this here for all.
Download here
Whats the purpose of this Library ?
Collect all Processes and their loaded DLL's (good if you want to know if you are hooked) ,
killing Processes (also system' ones), infos about process-memory and list all loaded drivers in the Kernel.
You can also change Process-Priority and you are able to read/write to others Processes'Memory.
download and evaluate the example.
And before you asked me stupid questions about Win89, i never tested this library with that OS, and i never plan to port that to Win89.
Re: Process Library released (another one)
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:13 pm
by Num3
Rings wrote: And before you asked me stupid questions about Win89, i never tested this library with that OS, and i never plan to port that to Win89.
LOL ... WIN89
Re: Process Library released (another one)
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:08 pm
by GPI
>LOL ... WIN89
New?
search.php and type Win89. 22 Matches...
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:22 pm
by Wolf
mmmmm Thank you Rings
Win98 is dead
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 9:14 pm
by dmoc
Win98... ok... but what about w95
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:58 am
by sec
Thank Rings,
Q:
are able to read/write to others Processes'Memory.
A:
; Process library examples
;
; (C) 2004 by Siegfried Rings
;
;Following Commands are not implemented in this Testapp , but Fully in the Library:
;pPokeB(PID,Offset,Value)
..
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 6:22 am
by sec
Missing GetOwnPID(),
and lib seem problem with other users's processes (as get pid).
hmm
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:56 am
by Kendrel
Works with 3.91, but doesnt work with 3.90...
this really sux that alot of libs doesnt work with older versions... i just wanted to mention it... ;(
Re: hmm
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 12:02 pm
by Rings
Kendrel wrote:Works with 3.91, but doesnt work with 3.90...
this really sux that alot of libs doesnt work with older versions... i just wanted to mention it... ;(
feel free and drive your 'VW GOLF I' these days....
the Problem is the Linker that changed in 3.91. So i believe it is better to support a newer version than an older one.
sorry for that, but i also did not support win89....
another problem is that older libs did not work with 3.91. And believ me, it is not a huge task to make them POLINK compatible.....
yah
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 1:07 pm
by Kendrel
i know its not up to you only...
i simply stick with 3.90 and 3.91... depends on what iam doing.
its too sad that i dont have some libs for 3.91... whatever... thx for your answer... great job anyways
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 4:35 pm
by blueznl
hey, if you have libs that you desperately need in 3.91 but there's no chance to ever get them updated, then wrap them in procedures, turn the result into a dll and use the dll
(dmoc: i was about to ask the same thing for 95
)
cool...
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 1:15 pm
by Kendrel
good idea... thats the way iam gonna do it i guess.
thx!
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 5:43 pm
by Rings
and include the dll as binary and expand at runtime only