Re: PureBasic 5.40 LTS beta 3 is out !
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 2:44 am
Outstanding additions! Thanks muchly!!
http://www.purebasic.com
https://www.purebasic.fr/english/
Code: Select all
UseZipPacker() ; Open the packed file
If OpenPack(0, "c:\vncviewer.zip") ; List all the entries
If ExaminePack(0)
While NextPackEntry(0)
Debug "Name: " + PackEntryName(0) + ", Size: " + PackEntrySize(0)
Wend
EndIf
ClosePack(0)
Else
Debug "bug"
EndIf
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... =4&t=62992supercdfr wrote:Seems to have a bug in the packer lib.
+1User_Russian wrote:Why did you remove this function?Fred wrote:- Removed RemovePackFile()
How to delete files from the archive?
yeah, great release.IdeasVacuum wrote:Wow - that's a biggy!Added HTTPS/TLS support for SendMail()
May I request that v54 final include the latest SQLite?Fred wrote:- Updated SQLite to 3.8.10.2
Fred explains it in reply to the following post:Teddy Rogers wrote:...I have been noticing a trend of a fattening up of compiled binaries with every new PB version.
few KB no problem todaysupercdfr wrote:I just compile a program with 4.50B1, and what the fuck is this size ????
My exe goes from 433Ko to 725Ko without changing a line of code.
Where are the optimisations ?
I guess some of us are way more sensitive than others.sartic wrote:few KB no problem todaysupercdfr wrote:I just compile a program with 4.50B1, and what the fuck is this size ????
My exe goes from 433Ko to 725Ko without changing a line of code.
Where are the optimisations ?
please be respectful
Hurray, that is just great!Fred wrote:
- Added Auto redirect support for ReceiveHTTPFile() and ReceiveHTTPMemory()
If you're aiming for a smaller executable size you can always pack it with UPX or another and reduce its footprint to at least 70% of its original size as well.heartbone wrote:I guess some of us are way more sensitive than others.sartic wrote:few KB no problem todaysupercdfr wrote:I just compile a program with 4.50B1, and what the fuck is this size ????
My exe goes from 433Ko to 725Ko without changing a line of code.
Where are the optimisations ?
please be respectful
I sensed no true disrespect, rather bewilderment by the difference.
A 67.4% increase in executable size with no source code changes is a lot.
No matter how you try to minimize it by the characterization of the value 292 as a few.
However, just because we have been spoiled by the amazingly small code size coming from the PB compilers over the years,
there was no guarantee that was a feature of the compiler.
If the executable size truly is a problem, then Fred's advice is very good.
There is not much that you can do with the newer version, that you can't do with a recent older version of the compiler.
Indeed. Now, many of the examples that downloaded assets from DropBox are working again.aaaaaaaargh wrote:Hurray, that is just great!Fred wrote:
- Added Auto redirect support for ReceiveHTTPFile() and ReceiveHTTPMemory()