PureBasic Forums - English

> PureBasic's future should be decided by its creator alone, not by its users.
> PureBasic is not open source.
Where's the connection?

Hroudtwolf wrote:@Brice, Kale & PB....

your noses are totally brown

Will you please just f*** off and stop trying to wind people up! :roll:

Kale wrote:

Hroudtwolf wrote:@Brice, Kale & PB....

your noses are totally brown

Will you please just f*** off and stop trying to wind people up! :roll:

Kale, fancy a beer m8? I know this thread is stressing you out and stuff... hell, it's stressing me and I'm only reading it!... I could do with a nice cold one right now, and a shovel to get rid of this snow. Damn it all! Hell is freezing over!

LuCiFeR[SD] wrote:Kale, fancy a beer m8?

Ta, ...gulp.. ahaaaa.

Hey, you're welcome old boy I know how hot under the collar I get... you looked like you needed a drink LOL

Hroudtwolf wrote:@Brice, Kale & PB....

your noses are totally brown

Because we like PB and are being honest and NOT flaming about this, you say we have our noses stuck up Fred's ass? Did somebody recently hit Germany with a big Dumb-Ass bomb?

I am sorry that we do not share your hatred for Fred and PB.

Oh Brice....
Your nose will be browner and browner. :roll:

I don't hate Fred. I don't hate Freak. I don't hate PureBasic.

But I hate people like you or Kale.
It smells like slime.

So you hate us because we like PB and you hate us because we are adults and can accept Fred's answer that OOP will not be in PB?

You're childish, my dear Brice.

@Brice... I don't know where you want to arrive. But your nose will be dark brown.

WishMaster wrote:You're childish, my dear Brice.

Perhaps you should reread the threads.

To recap since these threads are getting long:

1. PB is only for beginners since it doesn't have OOP
2. Only beginners don't use OOP
3. The generated code of PB is relatively slow
4. I don't think the compiler isn't well programmed
5. Anybody who points out Fred has said no is flamed
6. People pointing out Fred's answer are labled OOP haters

Brice Manuel wrote:So you hate us because we like PB and you hate us because we are adults and can accept Fred's answer that OOP will not be in PB?

Cool down, man. You´re totally embarrassing yourself. :roll:

Fred said some time ago, that he doesn´t want to include OOP in PB. Things can be changed

Ok. Brice.
Do you can sleep better when we say "we love you" ?



Brice the PB-Soldier.


Hroudtwolf: "I think PureBasic needs OOP."
Brice: "What OO? An attack to PureBasic ? You said PB isn't perfect ? Die...Die...."

Cool down, man

Me, I'm not mad

Hroudtwolf: "I think PureBasic needs OOP."
Brice: "What OO? An attack to PureBasic ? You said PB isn't perfect ? Die...Die...."

Be honest. I pointed out Fred's answer. Personally, I would love to see OOP in PB.

WishMaster wrote:> PureBasic's future should be decided by its creator alone, not by its users.
> PureBasic is not open source.
Where's the connection?

Purebasic isn't open source, yep thats true. It is, however, a commercially viable product, one available for sale that can be purchased by the general public. Maybe people expect a market to respond (supply) to their needs (demand) as in the normal consumer -product/market/consumer - supply/demand cycle. Without that supply and demand cycle a product being paid for by the public is just financing someones personal choices. So in this sense it should not be decided by its users, but instead by the market demand which drives the supply (the basic free enterprise system). Maybe this is what people are expecting and the reason why OOP keeps coming up, people paid for it and they are expecting a normal supply/demand market response like they are used to and expect when they pay for a product.