Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:02 pm
garretthylltun wrote:Wow! Now I don't have to watch "General Hospital" or "All My Children"
anymore!![]()
-Garrett
http://www.purebasic.com
https://www.purebasic.fr/english/
garretthylltun wrote:Wow! Now I don't have to watch "General Hospital" or "All My Children"
anymore!![]()
-Garrett
lol!thefool wrote:
![]()
watch out!
And if she also lets you have the odd drink ..thefool wrote:Too bad :/
well; if you are still allowed a little now and then it can't be all sad
pervert!Dare wrote:And if she also lets you have the odd drink ..thefool wrote:Too bad :/
well; if you are still allowed a little now and then it can't be all sad
Sure compared to powerbasic, but have you seen the GDC or other such open source projects newgroups and changelogs? Its constant bugfixes and updates. Speed is all relative so I guess it'll depend who you're comparing it to. Personally I think Fred does an amazing job cranking out what he does with such limited resources, I was just saying... relative to certain alternatives its fairly slow.PB wrote:> The slow pace of development
Slow? You're kidding, right? PureBasic has one of the fastest update rates
that I've ever seen for ANY software package, and I have quite a few!
Closest example: Some PowerBasic updates take over a YEAR to occur.
Look at PureBasic's update history and they're every 3 months or so.
Money not spent on booze, is money that can be spent on computer stuffi'm on strict orders from girlfriend to cut down drinking booze.
I second that, but only because you said:PB wrote:> The slow pace of development
Slow? You're kidding, right? PureBasic has one of the fastest update rates
that I've ever seen for ANY software package, and I have quite a few!
Closest example: Some PowerBasic updates take over a YEAR to occur.
Look at PureBasic's update history and they're every 3 months or so.
I own more than 1 commercial programming language and have to say that the support/bugfix-release of another one is done withhin hours. It's the fastest I've ever seen.PB wrote:... one of the fastest update rates...
Took a look at D last week and have to say that D has a lot of appealing stuff. The guy that wrote it has a lot of experience, he wrote several C++ compilers. D is like C++ done right.dracflamloc wrote:... It's led me to start considering other options like the D language when planning out a project.
Guess I'm misinformed but I thought you worked on the IDE? I'm talking about the compiler features here..?freak wrote:@dracflamloc:
> I think if Fred could expand to just 1 more developer on the libraries and compiler it'd really improve their progress a lot.
Hellooo, this is the second developer speaking!
Ok, i'm no fulltime man, but chances are very high that you'll be executing some code i wrote if you do something with PB
@Kale:
No hard feelings at all there from our side.
I'd just like to get some more proof with any further such statements
Now peace everyone!(sorry to those with certain girlfriends)
Well I actually use the GNU D compiler. Gotta support the open source all the way, but yea the digital mars guy is very good.fsw wrote:Took a look at D last week and have to say that D has a lot of appealing stuff. The guy that wrote it has a lot of experience, he wrote several C++ compilers. D is like C++ done right.dracflamloc wrote:... It's led me to start considering other options like the D language when planning out a project.
He's working on the libraries and the debugger.dracflamloc wrote:Guess I'm misinformed but I thought you worked on the IDE? I'm talking about the compiler features here..?
> I own more than 1 commercial programming language and have to say... one of the fastest update rates...