Page 5 of 5

Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 1:47 pm
by Psychophanta
DoubleDutch wrote:

Code: Select all

If you don't like it, then I suggest you use a programatic way around it (easily done), or drop the whole calculation, and fiddle with something else..
Thats almost exactly what I said to him at least 10 messages ago, he is obviously not listening.
I did it before put this thread :!: :x

Ha! those calculators which shows 0 or 1 when do 0^0 simply are lier calculators. Trust me :wink:
Fortunately well done calculators do it how must be done, and display indeterminated as result. 8) And still better done calculators, as i said above should allow to choose a result for that kind of operations. Ix86 based CPUs don't allow to choose.

Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 2:15 pm
by thefool
again, we have evidence that calculators does this. You just say they dont!
i even have a nearly-proffesional calculator that does return 1..
DoubleDutch wrote: It needs to be another system rather than how many questions you have asked. The current system is quite insulting actually! :wink:
im no "elite", i am god!
well its difficult to make another system hehe

Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 2:28 pm
by robink
I have a semi professional calculator too that returns a "Ma Error" :wink:

Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 2:32 pm
by Berikco
You guys have nothing else to do?? :shock:
Seems i'm the only one who keeps the economy running?? :twisted:

Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 2:35 pm
by thefool
oaky time to apologize!
my calc returns "Domain Error"... so i guess i just raised 1^0 instead of 0^0.
okay time to give you right, maybe, as 2 pro calc returns Domain error..

well sorry for my mistake..! :oops:


edit: @berico, we probaly have but somehow we are addicted to this thread :shock:

Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 2:44 pm
by MrMat
Psychophanta wrote:However, i can't see why lim x->0- x-[x] = 1. Are not that wrong?
I think it's correct if we're talking about the same function. I should have added that the integer part i meant was rounded down so that [-0.4]=-1, i.e. x = [x] + some value between 0 and 1. Then the graph of x-[x] looks like:
Image
So you can see what is happening. As we approach x=0 from below the function x-[x] approaches 1. As we approach x=0 from above x-[x] approaches 0.

Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 9:35 pm
by Psychophanta
MrMat wrote:...I should have added that the integer part i meant was rounded down so that [-0.4]=-1,
All right then, here is the difference, i took [-0.4] as -0 (watching at the number i just catched the integer part as you say).
So Okay then 8)

Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 1:20 pm
by Dare2
Woot!!!

An actual argument about nothing! :)

A learned and power^ful argument about nothing, no less. :D

We need you guys in the political system!
DoubleDutch wrote:It needs to be another system rather than how many questions you have asked. The current system is quite insulting actually! :wink:
What's wrong with the system? (postcount+1)

I got my ranking entirely by asking questions and did it in a period of about 4 months. 8)


lol.

Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 2:54 pm
by freedimension
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/sci-math-faq/s ... bers/0to0/

@psychophanta: I seldomly have seen such a impolite behaviour in here, all those :evil: and "you can't be more than 11 years old" and the like.
It's hard to believe you're any older or wiser :( Though one thing is sure, you've chosen your alias name advisedly.

Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 12:35 pm
by MikeB
I am bewildered that there are 5 pages of argument about this, mathmatical convention is that any number to the power of 0 is 1. This is accepted by mathematicians all over the world, end of argument!

MikeB

Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 1:20 pm
by Psychophanta
MikeB wrote:I am bewildered that there are 5 pages of argument about this, mathmatical convention is that any number to the power of 0 is 1. This is accepted by mathematicians all over the world, end of argument!

MikeB
I am bewildered that there are 5 pages of argument about this, mathmatical convention is that 0 to the power of any number is 0. This is accepted by mathematicians all over the world, end of argument!

Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 2:17 pm
by dagcrack
*tries to erase unuseful thread from DB*
*forgot he doesnt have the MySQL password*
*goes back to sleep*
*tries to delete thread from forum*
*forgot he doesnt have admin rights*
*goes back to sleep*

:lol:

Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 5:49 pm
by Psychophanta
Does someone know what is the value of:
lim x->0 x/x ? (no matter if approaching from right or from left side)

NOTE: please, only to someone knowing about :)

Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 5:53 pm
by MrMat
Psychophanta wrote:Does someone know what is the value of:
lim x->0 x/x ? (no matter if approaching from right or from left side)
It's 1 :)

Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 5:54 pm
by Psychophanta
MrMat wrote:
Psychophanta wrote:Does someone know what is the value of:
lim x->0 x/x ? (no matter if approaching from right or from left side)
It's 1 :)
That's all right,
this is the answer :wink:
THANKS :!: