Page 5 of 5
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 1:47 pm
by Psychophanta
DoubleDutch wrote:Code: Select all
If you don't like it, then I suggest you use a programatic way around it (easily done), or drop the whole calculation, and fiddle with something else..
Thats almost exactly what I said to him at least 10 messages ago, he is obviously not listening.
I did it before put this thread
Ha! those calculators which shows 0 or 1 when do 0^0 simply are lier calculators. Trust me
Fortunately well done calculators do it how must be done, and display indeterminated as result.

And still better done calculators, as i said above should allow to choose a result for that kind of operations. Ix86 based CPUs don't allow to choose.
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 2:15 pm
by thefool
again, we have evidence that calculators does this. You just say they dont!
i even have a nearly-proffesional calculator that does return 1..
DoubleDutch wrote:
It needs to be another system rather than how many questions you have asked. The current system is quite insulting actually!
im no "elite", i am god!
well its difficult to make another system hehe
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 2:28 pm
by robink
I have a semi professional calculator too that returns a "Ma Error"

Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 2:32 pm
by Berikco
You guys have nothing else to do??
Seems i'm the only one who keeps the economy running??

Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 2:35 pm
by thefool
oaky time to apologize!
my calc returns "Domain Error"... so i guess i just raised 1^0 instead of 0^0.
okay time to give you right, maybe, as 2 pro calc returns Domain error..
well sorry for my mistake..!
edit: @berico, we probaly have but somehow we are addicted to this thread

Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 2:44 pm
by MrMat
Psychophanta wrote:However, i can't see why lim x->0- x-[x] = 1. Are not that wrong?
I think it's correct if we're talking about the same function. I should have added that the integer part i meant was rounded down so that [-0.4]=-1, i.e. x = [x] + some value between 0 and 1. Then the graph of x-[x] looks like:

So you can see what is happening. As we approach x=0 from below the function x-[x] approaches 1. As we approach x=0 from above x-[x] approaches 0.
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 9:35 pm
by Psychophanta
MrMat wrote:...I should have added that the integer part i meant was rounded down so that [-0.4]=-1,
All right then, here is the difference, i took [-0.4] as -0 (watching at the number i just catched the integer part as you say).
So Okay then

Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 1:20 pm
by Dare2
Woot!!!
An actual argument about nothing!
A learned and power^ful argument about nothing, no less.
We need you guys in the political system!
DoubleDutch wrote:It needs to be another system rather than how many questions you have asked. The current system is quite insulting actually!
What's wrong with the system? (postcount+1)
I got my ranking entirely by asking questions and did it in a period of about 4 months.
lol.
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 2:54 pm
by freedimension
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/sci-math-faq/s ... bers/0to0/
@psychophanta: I seldomly have seen such a impolite behaviour in here, all those

and "you can't be more than 11 years old" and the like.
It's hard to believe you're any older or wiser

Though one thing is sure, you've chosen your alias name advisedly.
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 12:35 pm
by MikeB
I am bewildered that there are 5 pages of argument about this, mathmatical convention is that any number to the power of 0 is 1. This is accepted by mathematicians all over the world, end of argument!
MikeB
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 1:20 pm
by Psychophanta
MikeB wrote:I am bewildered that there are 5 pages of argument about this, mathmatical convention is that any number to the power of 0 is 1. This is accepted by mathematicians all over the world, end of argument!
MikeB
I am bewildered that there are 5 pages of argument about this, mathmatical convention is that 0 to the power of any number is 0. This is accepted by mathematicians all over the world, end of argument!
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 2:17 pm
by dagcrack
*tries to erase unuseful thread from DB*
*forgot he doesnt have the MySQL password*
*goes back to sleep*
*tries to delete thread from forum*
*forgot he doesnt have admin rights*
*goes back to sleep*

Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 5:49 pm
by Psychophanta
Does someone know what is the value of:
lim x->0 x/x ? (no matter if approaching from right or from left side)
NOTE: please, only to someone knowing about

Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 5:53 pm
by MrMat
Psychophanta wrote:Does someone know what is the value of:
lim x->0 x/x ? (no matter if approaching from right or from left side)
It's 1

Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 5:54 pm
by Psychophanta
MrMat wrote:Psychophanta wrote:Does someone know what is the value of:
lim x->0 x/x ? (no matter if approaching from right or from left side)
It's 1

That's all right,
this is the answer
THANKS
