Page 5 of 5

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 9:11 pm
by Max.²
@ Newbie

Updated it; was a stupid error in conjuction with the PB string handling.

More in a bit; dinner is done now. :twisted:

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 9:15 pm
by newbie
ok it works now, had verified it with a software I have which does hash of strings ;)

Still, a big Lib ! why is it so huge ? (for a lib)

EDIT : may be should we do another topic for SHA ? or take the old one I done in general discussion, don't know.

EDIT 2 : waiting for your "after dinner" work now... go go go :twisted:

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 10:33 pm
by Max.²
Back. Yummy. :lol:

The lib is so big, because it also contains SHA2 and HMAC. Especially SHA2 is relatively big.

Not sure if I will get them going today, too. But it shouldn't be too difficult now. The generic functions work, but I want the easy access functions work too.

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 10:38 pm
by newbie
Hey dear, finally come back :)

Ok for the lib size.
May be later (once finished) could you split the lib into corresponding names ? (SHA1, SHA2, etc...).
but I want the easy access functions work too.
take your time, I'm for one who love easy and simple commands :P

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 10:59 pm
by thefool
isnt there something about that you can make a lib only include the needed procedure in an exe?

i think tailbite does that automatic..

Try make different exe's with the different encryptions and see if thats true.

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 11:34 pm
by Shannara
thefool wrote:isnt there something about that you can make a lib only include the needed procedure in an exe?

i think tailbite does that automatic..

Try make different exe's with the different encryptions and see if thats true.
Damn, you beat me to it.

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:10 am
by sec
newbie wrote: such as , Max :
SHA-1 / SHA-256

Sec :
SHA-384 (is it the good one ?)
SHA-512

I have always liked multitasking ^^

Anyway, downloading your Lib right now :)

EDIT : why the SHA library is so huge (20.3Ko) against only 9Ko for AES ? I would have thought that AES would have been far bigger than a hash algorithm.
done part of me and it is small and simple .why? because it is PURE :twisted:

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 11:41 am
by newbie
Hi Sec,

it was just an example I was giving, don't know what Max is doing on his side ;)

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:25 pm
by thefool
Damn, you beat me to it.
come get some!

:D well i just saw in another thread that you cant jugde on the filesize of the lib, because it only includes the needed procedures.

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 3:36 pm
by Max.²
newbie wrote:don't know what Max is doing on his side ;)
Currently I am trying to get a little bit of structure into the code snippet and library mess on my system. Then I start a new thread. :lol:

I finished updating the AES Library and need to package it; then I will split the SHA Libraries. Am not sure yet if I will continue on SHA2 next or if I add some more functions to the SHA1 one.

BTW, as thefool said, the size of a library really doesn't matter, only of the functions inside. The size of them can vary royally, depending on the optimization chosen. I personally am more for speed then for size, but maybe it is worth to compile them to 2 versions; most speed and least size.

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:17 am
by NoahPhense
Ok, so whats the latest here? Which link or code is the AES256?

Anything higher, other than encrypting twice?

- np

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:42 pm
by kinglestat
i am mightiliy excited by this post

BUT

where do we download the library ?
and then which post effectiveley describes how to use it ?

I know it might sound or look dumb to some of you
But since none of the urls works there is nothing to go on!

cheers

KingLestat

SEC's AES v3

Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 7:42 am
by CherokeeStalker
Is this still available for download anywhere ?
Please post a link if it is.
Thanks !