Page 31 of 40
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:48 am
by sec
gnozal wrote:sec wrote:Frontier wrote:Inner wrote:4.30 beta 2 & 3 of Purebasic reports;
The following PureLibrary is missing: StringExtension
Hi,
All gnozal's libraries expose this error, it has to do with differences in PB 4.30b2. When gnozal recompiles his libraries for PB 4.30b2 (or final) the error will disappear.
Hi gnozal,
Did you fix this error?How fix this error?
The libs will be recompiled with PB4.30
final.
Thanks,
but can't wait to try purezip
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:54 am
by gnozal
sec wrote:Thanks,
but can't wait to try purezip
You can try the PB4.20 version or the DLL version with PB4.30 beta x
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 4:23 pm
by GeoTrail
4.3 final?
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 5:03 pm
by JCV
beta 5 is the "release candidate". So its good for final 4.3 update?
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 3:55 pm
by sec
JCV wrote:beta 5 is the "release candidate". So its good for final 4.3 update?
True.
gnozal: Please hear purezip users, we need you
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:57 am
by gnozal
sec wrote:JCV wrote:beta 5 is the "release candidate". So its good for final 4.3 update?
True.
gnozal: Please hear purezip users, we need you
Ok, ok ...
Here it is (recompiled with PB4.30b5) :
http://freenet-homepage.de/gnozal/PureZIP_430.zip
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:39 pm
by sec
gnozal wrote:sec wrote:JCV wrote:beta 5 is the "release candidate". So its good for final 4.3 update?
True.
gnozal: Please hear purezip users, we need you
Ok, ok ...
Here it is (recompiled with PB4.30b5) :
http://freenet-homepage.de/gnozal/PureZIP_430.zip
Thanks
gnozal, it works
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:31 am
by Seymour Clufley
Thanks for that, Gnozal. Your tools are much appreciated!
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:36 pm
by Sveinung
Gnozal
First of all thank you for these excelent libs. But it is possible to get them in 4.30 x64? Please
Regards
Sveinung
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:48 pm
by gnozal
Sveinung wrote:First of all thank you for these excelent libs. But it is possible to get them in 4.30 x64?
Not for the moment.
Sorry.
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 4:42 pm
by besko
What lib more faster compressing data PureLZMA or PureZIP library ?
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:07 pm
by gnozal
besko wrote:What lib more faster compressing data PureLZMA or PureZIP library ?
I think ZIP should be faster and LZMA compress better.
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:09 pm
by PB
@gnozal: Can you set the compression level in PureZIP? I was playing with
your lib today but couldn't see anything in the Help file for it? Am I blind?
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:47 am
by gnozal
PB wrote:@gnozal: Can you set the compression level in PureZIP? I was playing with your lib today but couldn't see anything in the Help file for it? Am I blind?
You can choose between no compression (store) and best compression (deflate algo) with PureZIP_SetCompressionAlgorithm().
I think there is no reason to choose a low compression algo as deflate is very fast.
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:24 pm
by PB
So I assume the deflate algo is the default, then? The Help doesn't say.
