All PureFORM, JaPBe, Libs and useful code maintained by gnozal
Moderator: gnozal
sec
Enthusiast
Posts: 792 Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 3:13 am
Location: 90-61-92 // EU or ASIA
Contact:
Post
by sec » Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:48 am
gnozal wrote: sec wrote: Frontier wrote: Inner wrote: 4.30 beta 2 & 3 of Purebasic reports;
The following PureLibrary is missing: StringExtension
Hi,
All gnozal's libraries expose this error, it has to do with differences in PB 4.30b2. When gnozal recompiles his libraries for PB 4.30b2 (or final) the error will disappear.
Hi gnozal,
Did you fix this error?How fix this error?
The libs will be recompiled with PB4.30
final .
Thanks,
but can't wait to try purezip
gnozal
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 4229 Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 8:27 am
Location: Strasbourg / France
Contact:
Post
by gnozal » Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:54 am
sec wrote: Thanks,
but can't wait to try purezip
You can try the PB4.20 version or the DLL version with PB4.30 beta x
For free libraries and tools, visit my web site (also home of jaPBe V3 and PureFORM).
GeoTrail
Addict
Posts: 2794 Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 12:45 am
Location: Bergen, Norway
Contact:
Post
by GeoTrail » Tue Dec 02, 2008 4:23 pm
4.3 final?
I Stepped On A Cornflake!!! Now I'm A Cereal Killer!
JCV
Enthusiast
Posts: 580 Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Philippines
Post
by JCV » Tue Dec 02, 2008 5:03 pm
beta 5 is the "release candidate". So its good for final 4.3 update?
[Registered PB User since 2006]
[PureBasic 6.20][SpiderBasic 2.2]
[RP4 x64][Win 11 x64][Ubuntu x64]
sec
Enthusiast
Posts: 792 Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 3:13 am
Location: 90-61-92 // EU or ASIA
Contact:
Post
by sec » Sat Dec 06, 2008 3:55 pm
JCV wrote: beta 5 is the "release candidate". So its good for final 4.3 update?
True.
gnozal: Please hear purezip users, we need you
gnozal
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 4229 Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 8:27 am
Location: Strasbourg / France
Contact:
Post
by gnozal » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:57 am
sec wrote: JCV wrote: beta 5 is the "release candidate". So its good for final 4.3 update?
True.
gnozal: Please hear purezip users, we need you
Ok, ok ...
Here it is (recompiled with PB4.30b5) :
http://freenet-homepage.de/gnozal/PureZIP_430.zip
For free libraries and tools, visit my web site (also home of jaPBe V3 and PureFORM).
sec
Enthusiast
Posts: 792 Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 3:13 am
Location: 90-61-92 // EU or ASIA
Contact:
Post
by sec » Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:39 pm
gnozal wrote: sec wrote: JCV wrote: beta 5 is the "release candidate". So its good for final 4.3 update?
True.
gnozal: Please hear purezip users, we need you
Ok, ok ...
Here it is (recompiled with PB4.30b5) :
http://freenet-homepage.de/gnozal/PureZIP_430.zip
Thanks
gnozal , it works
Seymour Clufley
Addict
Posts: 1264 Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:13 am
Location: London
Post
by Seymour Clufley » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:31 am
Thanks for that, Gnozal. Your tools are much appreciated!
Sveinung
Enthusiast
Posts: 142 Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 11:03 am
Location: Bergen, Norway
Post
by Sveinung » Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:36 pm
Gnozal
First of all thank you for these excelent libs. But it is possible to get them in 4.30 x64? Please
Regards
Sveinung
gnozal
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 4229 Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 8:27 am
Location: Strasbourg / France
Contact:
Post
by gnozal » Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:48 pm
Sveinung wrote: First of all thank you for these excelent libs. But it is possible to get them in 4.30 x64?
Not for the moment.
Sorry.
For free libraries and tools, visit my web site (also home of jaPBe V3 and PureFORM).
besko
User
Posts: 42 Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:08 pm
Post
by besko » Tue Jan 27, 2009 4:42 pm
What lib more faster compressing data PureLZMA or PureZIP library ?
gnozal
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 4229 Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 8:27 am
Location: Strasbourg / France
Contact:
Post
by gnozal » Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:07 pm
besko wrote: What lib more faster compressing data PureLZMA or PureZIP library ?
I think ZIP should be faster and LZMA compress better.
For free libraries and tools, visit my web site (also home of jaPBe V3 and PureFORM).
PB
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581 Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm
Post
by PB » Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:09 pm
@gnozal: Can you set the compression level in PureZIP? I was playing with
your lib today but couldn't see anything in the Help file for it? Am I blind?
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
gnozal
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 4229 Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 8:27 am
Location: Strasbourg / France
Contact:
Post
by gnozal » Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:47 am
PB wrote: @gnozal: Can you set the compression level in PureZIP? I was playing with your lib today but couldn't see anything in the Help file for it? Am I blind?
You can choose between no compression (store) and best compression (deflate algo) with PureZIP_SetCompressionAlgorithm().
I think there is no reason to choose a low compression algo as deflate is very fast.
For free libraries and tools, visit my web site (also home of jaPBe V3 and PureFORM).
PB
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581 Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm
Post
by PB » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:24 pm
So I assume the deflate algo is the default, then? The Help doesn't say.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.