PureBasic Forums - English

Fred wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 8:15 am 2024-06-05: final version is out

Thanks a lot!

Jeromyal wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 9:17 am Got the PureBasic 6.11 LTS for Linux (Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 - x64)

IDE says it is still Beta 3

The same on my side.
It also tells me that there is a new version available on startup.

Fred wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 8:15 am 2024-06-05: final version is out, thanks for testing!

Thanks Fred for all the work done !

NicTheQuick wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 9:36 am

Jeromyal wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 9:17 am Got the PureBasic 6.11 LTS for Linux (Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 - x64)

IDE says it is still Beta 3

The same on my side.
It also tells me that there is a new version available on startup.

Thanks, I just uploaded again the package, it should be good now !

Thanks Fred!!!

Thank you to the PB Team !

Thank you Fred & the team!

Thank you, Fred and Team!

About double space filled for the installation package than <=PB6.04. Executeables about 10 times bigger than <=PB6.04.
But thanks, because other features are done.

Thank you!

Psychophanta wrote: Fri Jun 07, 2024 2:20 pm About double space filled for the installation package than <=PB6.04. Executeables about 10 times bigger than <=PB6.04.
But thanks, because other features are done.

but dont you see a SIGNIFICANT reduced filesize of exe's of 6.11 vs 6.10 ?

@plouf, i did not test it, to me don't mind much really, because of the advantages are perhaps bigger than disadvantages

@plouf, you are right: My somewhat bigger Programm compiles now smaller (tested with X64, ASM, identical options)
6.04 : 399K
6.10 : 1000K (x 2.7)
6.11 : 640K (x 1.6)

I can live with a Exe-BlowUps of less than x2 ..., 6.10 usually produced x3-5 for my projects, so I had skipped the 6.10.

Thanks a lot Fred and team!
PureBasic for ever!

Fred wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:17 pmReplaced polink with lld-link on Windows

ld.exe from GCC did not work?