Re: To Fred and Timo: Can we have a discussion about the fut
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:25 am
(removed)
http://www.purebasic.com
https://www.purebasic.fr/english/
I agree this thread will become a mess but I don't agree we will win nothing. Imo without some concrete offers being put down nothing structured will be created and all this will just remain idle talk.HeX0R wrote:I really love this idea and would be happy to spend my money to evolve PB, but we need some structured way to do so.
If now anyone throws in his own wishes, this whole thread will turn into a mess and we will win nothing!
Well put down your request / offerLittle John wrote:The mail library is currently just a toy. In order to change it into a tool, more improvements are needed.
+1Fred wrote:Let us think a bit more about it and we will do a special page (on forum or on website) to handle it smoothly.
Fred wrote:Let us think a bit more about it and we will do a special page (on forum or on website) to handle it smoothly.
I would also happily pay another license fee for this as a separate product even if the first iteration only had PB's variable types, structures, lists, maps and library. Just enough essential parts to enable creating wrappers that could be used to glue together functionality from some of the ubiquitous libraries you get with a GNU/Linux distro.langinagel wrote:From my professional view PB could have still a very nice future in the embedded world. There is C and just C and maybe Assembler....and perhaps some C++. Why not PB for a Linux based most embedded platform: ARM.
+1djes wrote:It's great !
In my opinion, this is not necessary because all functions are optional.Cyllceaux wrote:Maybe it would be a good idea to split Versions.
A Beginner-friendly-one and a professional-one.
+1applePi wrote:i think Fred should change the way of the purebasic licensing. [...] so who own purebasic 5 should pay for v6
+1Mistrel wrote:I think a bounty on suggestions is a fantastic idea
+1Cyllceaux wrote:How about founding/donations something like this:
Thank youFred wrote:Let us think a bit more about it and we will do a special page (on forum or on website) to handle it smoothly.
I can definitely agree with this - perhaps even something we would access via our Purebasic members area login, completely without forum.Fred wrote:Let us think a bit more about it and we will do a special page (on forum or on website) to handle it smoothly.
Obviously it wouldn't need to be so generous ($20,000!)... but I like the principle and I think it works.You may use the discounted license if:
You are an individual, and REAPER is only for your personal use, or
You are an individual or business using REAPER commercially, and yearly gross revenue does not exceed USD $20,000, or
You are an educational or non-profit organization.
The annual license fee doesn't enable you to push for the features that really matter to you. I was eagerly awaiting details of what was going to be new in 5.70 - were we going to get better network commands, password support for the packer library, improvements to ListIconGadget, better WebGadget, ...? When the announcement came there was nothing there that really interested me at all. So now I'm back to having my fingers crossed for the next release with no way to influence what will be added.swan wrote:I think this is all a great idea. But I also think an annual licence fee will go a long way to achieve the same without the complications ....