Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:49 am
Google toolbar is listed is an Opera 'widget': http://widgets.opera.com/moogle wrote:doesn't have the google toolbar
http://www.purebasic.com
https://www.purebasic.fr/english/
Google toolbar is listed is an Opera 'widget': http://widgets.opera.com/moogle wrote:doesn't have the google toolbar
From: http://widgets.opera.com/widget/4282/the.weavster wrote:Google toolbar is listed is an Opera 'widget': http://widgets.opera.com/moogle wrote:doesn't have the google toolbar
I also mean as in the style of ff.(this toolbar is unofficial)
Probably: http://operawatch.com/news/2007/01/what ... fixed.htmlblueznl wrote:Did they fix the bugs / holes yet?
and it has very good integrated developer tools.Automatic crash recovery
Tab isolation
If a website or add-on causes a tab to crash in Internet Explorer 8, only that tab is affected. The browser itself remains stable and other tabs remain unaffected, thereby minimizing any disruption to your browsing experience.
Crash recovery
If one or more of your tabs do crash, your tabs are automatically reloaded and you are returned to whatever page you were on before the crash.
InPrivate Blocking
Today websites increasingly pull content in from multiple sources, providing tremendous value to consumer and sites alike. Users are often not aware that some content, images, ads and analytics are being provided from third party websites or that these websites have the ability to potentially track their behavior across multiple websites. InPrivate Blocking provides users an added level of control and choice about the information that third party websites can potentially use to track browsing activity.
To use this feature, open a new tab and select InPrivate Browsing, or select "InPrivate Browsing" from the Safety menu. To end your InPrivate Browsing session, simply close the browser window.
Note: Because InPrivate Blocking is designed to watch for and block only third-party content that appears with a high frequency across sites you visit, no content is blocked until such levels are detected, nor is any such content blocked which is served directly by the site you are visiting. Depending on your web browsing activity and sites visited, the amount of time it can take before such content is automatically blocked can vary widely. However, at any time, you can customize which third-party content is blocked or allowed though subscribing to InPrivate allow and block feeds.
Wasn't ThunderBird now being developed by individuals now or is it totally dropped by everyone? (I haven't read any announcements)Mozilla have already pulled the plug on Thunderbird, probably because Google wants everyone to use G-Mail, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Firefox go next.
If you read this and follow the links it does seem the future for Thunderbird is not entirely without hope: http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=22235 I think around 85% of Mozillas funding was coming from Google though so finding the funds to keep it going may be tough.Fangbeast wrote:Wasn't ThunderBird now being developed by individuals now or is it totally dropped by everyone? (I haven't read any announcements)Mozilla have already pulled the plug on Thunderbird, probably because Google wants everyone to use G-Mail, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Firefox go next.
I'm kind of thinking this may be an over reaction?gnozal wrote:And now there is a Google Chrome Anonymizer :
http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google ... nonymizer/
Code: Select all
"user_experience_metrics": {
"client_id": "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000",
"client_id_timestamp": "1220391824",
"num_bookmarks_in_other_bookmark_folder": 88,
"num_bookmarks_on_bookmark_bar": 57,
"num_folders_in_other_bookmark_folder": 17,
"num_folders_on_bookmark_bar": 9,
"num_keywords": 11,
"reporting_enabled": false,
"security": {
"renderer_on_sbox_desktop": 569
},
They are actually using WebKit, which means the rending engine has been in development since 1998.pdwyer wrote:nice rendering though for a first version
Opera's layout can be changed to match Firefox's.thefool wrote:tried opera for a bit and turned back to firefox again, i just like it. Nothing against opera at all of course, but firefox's feature set and layout just seems to suit me well
If it did that, it means you clicked "Run" when asked. It's not Opera's fault.garretthylltun wrote:I was recently using Opera myself, but when I visited a website for some Windows Themes, it infected me with that damn "XP Antivirus 2008" malware program. I was a bit upset because I thought Opera might be a bit more safer to use and wouldn't get hit by such a thing, but it did. So I'm back to using FireFox with some plugins to prevent such things from hitting me again.
Other than that, Opera has come a long long way. Solid, useful, well done if you ask me.
W3C says: 287 Errorspdwyer wrote:http://battlefield.ea.com/battlefield/bf/
great articleIn practice, with the web, there’s a bit of a problem: no way to test a web page against the standard, because there’s no reference implementation that guarantees that if it works, all the browsers work. This just doesn’t exist.