PureBasic Forums - English

naw wrote:...Makes you wonder how they landed a man on the moon.

Actually some believe in the conspiracy theory that the moon landing never happed.
According to this conspiracy theory it's all recorded in a studio.
IIRC the proof should be that the shadows in the moon landing pictures are wrong.
:roll:

there are also sites showing pictures taken on earth that show a simliar look of the shadows, the thing is I do think they had the technology to land a man on the moon but I don't think they had the technology to fake it.
And than you shouldn't forget they had Wernherr von Braun who build their rockets
Either way if they did land on the moon the evidence is up there and without an atmosphere it will stay intact for the next millions of years, when you look at the mars rovers I don't think it would be hard to send a probe up there and check the evidence. And I guess nations like china would be willing and certainly have the technology to prove it was a fake if it were. So well I guess China has proven the story to be true.

naw wrote: IIRC the proof should be that the shadows in the moon landing pictures are wrong. :roll:

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/
http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm

and goes on forever

naw wrote:Not all Americans are stupid - some are very stupid...
Makes you wonder how they landed a man on the moon.
Oh yes - Germans. Oh well.

indeed, most real advantages the US had were based on the work of German scientists.
also the "flying wing" was a German concept, the B2 would not exist without it.
(did you know, the Brooklin-Bridge is the work of a German engeneer,
who did not get enough money for his projects in Germany?)

but I would not say, americans are stupid in general... they are just normal people.
when I want to prove dumbness, in every country I can interview a thousand people
and use the twenty dumbest answeres for a faked evidence.

;---------------------------------------------------------------------
didn't look up the links.
the argument with the shadows is rediculous.
those who made it had no idea about shadow-prejection photographed from a certain perspective.

I investigated all the so-called proves, none does stand an unbiased test.
I liked the idea the moon-landing was faked. I convinced myself it was real.

perhaps some or the pictures were recreated, because the original material was too bad.
they wanted a complete success...

but they were there - the reflection-platform is still there,
they send a laser-beam to the moon every day and measure the reflection.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4w9EksAo5hY

I am pretty sure they landed on the moon though. I have been reading up on those "hoax" theories but i think they were disproven rather well. Besides, as you say, if it was a hoax it would be rather difficult to keep it a secret

especially so when many countries would have a huge benefit if nobody woudl trust the USA again.

if it was a hoax it would be rather difficult to keep it a secret

the "hoax-fans" say, people were killed by the CIA to keep the secret,
and that Stanley Kubrick's depression had to do with the fact,
that he helped in the studios that faked the moon-landing,
and was in fear of the CIA.
("a maniac finds his evidence everywhere")

I think, the simple fact that there is a plate on the moon to reflect a laser beam beats it.
someone had to be there to place this plate!

PS:
@Nik
good point for a political reason.
if it was a fake, USSR and China would have proved it to dishonor the US.

Well... my father and my stepfather both worked at NASA from Mercury/Redstone through Gemini and Apollo 14, none of it was faked.

The proof for universal stupidity stems from the fact that anyone could believe that the moon landing was faked. There are still people that think the world is flat even today...

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/ sadly this is not a joke...

Common sense goes a long way, if used.

Seems that's a procedure not "called" enough.

sadly this is not a joke...

sure?
the "Notice for newbies" was posted by "General Gadget Penis"...

I would rather think, this is a sociological experiment...

Kaeru Gaman wrote:I think, the simple fact that there is a plate on the moon to reflect a laser beam beats it.
someone had to be there to place this plate!

A robot like the one on Mars! (Robot that is, not plate)

(Robot that is, not plate)

there is a plate on the moon to reflect a laser beam.
...I can't imagine how to use a robot to reflect a laser beam.
you need a plate, like a squaremeter of alu-foil, to reflect a beam.

they also left a car there, but that can't be proven by a test.
the plate can be proven because the laserbeam returns after the appropriate time.

Kaeru Gaman wrote:

(Robot that is, not plate)

there is a plate on the moon to reflect a laser beam.
...I can't imagine how to use a robot to reflect a laser beam.
you need a plate, like a squaremeter of alu-foil, to reflect a beam.
.

He's saying that the plate could have been placed there by a robot.

Trond wrote:He's saying that the plate could have been placed there by a robot.

hm...
so, in 1969
- building a Robot that is able to do such things
- and sending it to the Moon
- and landing it in a way that it keeps functionality
- and can place a plate that will reflect a leserbeam.....

wow, much more impressive than sending three naked apes up there...