Page 28 of 42
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:54 pm
by RichAlgeni
infratec wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:42 pmAn other reason to implement more network stuff instead of 3D stuff.
Agreed. I understand others will use the 3D capabilities. But network extensions would interest me much more.
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:56 pm
by RichAlgeni
Thank being said, the fact that Raspberry Pi is now included blows my mind! I love it!
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:15 am
by marcoagpinto
@Fred
Could you add the possibility to use -o3 (optimise level 3) in GCC?
Thanks!
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 9:32 am
by Joris
A Big Thanks Fred and the PB Team.
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 3:32 pm
by mk-soft
I upgraded my PI 4 today to Raspberry Pi OS (64bit) with desktop.
Installed all required packages according to
Simple install of PureBasic. Unpacked PureBasic for Linux Arm64 and started it.
Tested some projects.
It runs
Many thanks to the PB-Team
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:57 pm
by Tenaja
Many thanks to the PB-Team
+1
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 8:14 pm
by dige
A great step forward! Thx PB-Team!
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2022 12:09 am
by box_80
Thanks PB Team!!
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:37 pm
by Cyllceaux
Oh... I hate the gcc... everytime you want to do something cool, you see: "Oh, it is in an other version of the gcc"
the mingw-gcc is from 2018 and the modernst CPU in this build is then Zen1 from 2017. Yes, it is a windows-Problem and Yes I can recompile it for windows, too.
So, I mostly use this for Windows. And it work for PB, too.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/gcc-win64/
So, I changed this project:
https://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtopic.php?t=78558
And added a new parameter, So I can do this:
Code: Select all
CompilerIf #PB_Compiler_Backend=#PB_Backend_C
!//gccflags -mtune=znver3 -march=znver3 ;
!//gccpath C:\Users\Silko Pillasch\Downloads\gcc11\bin\gcc.exe ;
CompilerEndIf
And yes... PB works fine in gcc-11.1
And a fun thing...
My encryption tool encodes for a 1 GB File:
fasm: 11768ms
gcc8: 12998ms
gcc11: 11889ms
gcc11 with parameter: 6221ms
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:43 pm
by Psychophanta
To me is hard to say it, but MS C++ is the most advanced one everytime. 'gcc' is garbage at his side.
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:59 pm
by Cyllceaux
Psychophanta wrote: Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:43 pm
To me is hard to say it, but MS C++ is the most advanced one everytime. 'gcc' is garbage at his side.
Long time ago, intel and IBM had the most advanced compiler. There were sometimes Performanceboosts up to 80%... But now... I don't know which one is the best.
I like the lcc and the tcc... small, fast but a little bit outdated.
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2022 10:51 pm
by nsstudios
Fred wrote: Wed May 19, 2021 10:08 am
Code: Select all
- Changed the way the map elements are created when using passive syntax, to be more consistent. There is no more a dummy element.
What does this mean?
I thought it was a fix for
Code: Select all
NewMap m()
If m("test")=5: EndIf
Debug MapSize(m()); 1
?
Thank you for the updates, some nice stuff for sure!
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:32 am
by STARGÅTE
nsstudios wrote: Sun Mar 06, 2022 10:51 pm
Fred wrote: Wed May 19, 2021 10:08 am
Code: Select all
- Changed the way the map elements are created when using passive syntax, to be more consistent. There is no more a dummy element.
What does this mean?
I thought it was a fix for
Code: Select all
NewMap m()
If m("test")=5: EndIf
Debug MapSize(m()); 1
?
Thank you for the updates, some nice stuff for sure!
Now, a map element (used in a comparison or calculation) is allways created. Before, sometimes dummy elements were used for this and the element was not created.
See my example from last year:
Map access should not always result in creation of element
So now, the access on a map element always result in creation of this element.
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:15 am
by nsstudios
Thanks for explaining!
I was really hoping it would be fixed to only work when assigning a value to it.
STARGÅTE wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:32 am
nsstudios wrote: Sun Mar 06, 2022 10:51 pm
Fred wrote: Wed May 19, 2021 10:08 am
Code: Select all
- Changed the way the map elements are created when using passive syntax, to be more consistent. There is no more a dummy element.
What does this mean?
I thought it was a fix for
Code: Select all
NewMap m()
If m("test")=5: EndIf
Debug MapSize(m()); 1
?
Thank you for the updates, some nice stuff for sure!
Now, a map element (used in a comparison or calculation) is allways created. Before, sometimes dummy elements were used for this and the element was not created.
See my example from last year:
Map access should not always result in creation of element
So now, the access on a map element always result in creation of this element.
Re: PureBasic 6.00 Beta 5 released !
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2022 12:51 pm
by User_Russian
What's this? Why inactive? I can't clean the check mark. Is it a bug?
