PureBasic Forums - English

Another bug, this is 100% latest jaPBe bug, hangs when using (F6) with the code found @ http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... 889#144889 I have mistakenly listed it as a PB bug, when infact it's a jaPBe bug (unfortunately). Notice, the referenced code works perfectly with the PB code editor.

Beta update

- Imported functions [Import/EndImport] now also have tooltips

Some restrictions due to detection method :
. detection when loading file = Import[C]/EndImport block
. detection when editing = As keyword
So only imports with 'As' are detected while editing, but all imports are detected while file loading (this feature assumes there is one imported function per line).

Download Last BETA [EXE only] http://people.freenet.de/gnozal/jaPBeForPB400_beta.zip

Shannara wrote:Another bug, this is 100% latest jaPBe bug, hangs when using (F6) with the code found @ http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... 889#144889 I have mistakenly listed it as a PB bug, when infact it's a jaPBe bug (unfortunately). Notice, the referenced code works perfectly with the PB code editor.

Sorry, can't test it right now (I am under NT4).
Note that jaPBe uses the external debugger and the PE IDE usually the internal debugger. Did you try the PB IDE with external debugger ?

Great job, let me know if you're open to suggestions

Because I have a nice feature list which would add a lot to the IDE (been adding them myself for private builds but you are far away from that, so, better add to it).

They are not bloat though!, I made the list since the first time I put my eyes on JaPBe.


Name suggestion: JaPB3 !

dagcrack wrote:Great job, let me know if you're open to suggestions
Because I have a nice feature list which would add a lot to the IDE (been adding them myself for private builds but you are far away from that, so, better add to it).

I am always open to suggestions... but I cannot promise to implement everything (it's only a hobby, I am no professional programmer, and I am sometimes short on time).
This was also my private build, but as jaPBe is open source I decided to make it public.

jaPBe 3.6.5 released


Bug fix release

gnozal wrote:jaPBe 3.6.5 released

Is this the link for the realease: http://people.freenet.de/gnozal/jaPBeForPB400_beta.zip?

Or it is missing

What is Codepage?

>Procedure MenuItemAlt(id,Text$)

When this procedure is executed, it is sure to become Codepage=0.
It is Codepage=0 to execute this Procedure even when Japanese(932) is set.

oryaaaaa wrote:What is Codepage?

>Procedure MenuItemAlt(id,Text$)

When this procedure is executed, it is sure to become Codepage=0.
It is Codepage=0 to execute this Procedure even when Japanese(932) is set.

Some infos :
The variable CodePage is the CodePage of the actual source (it is what you see in 'Project Options' [F8]).
The variable DefaultProject\CodePage is the default CodePage for a new source (it is what you see in 'Preferences' [CTRL+P]).

Could you test http://people.freenet.de/gnozal/jaPBeForPB400_beta.zip and tell me what you think ?

dagcrack's suggestion of a slight name change is a good idea. If JaPBe and JaPBe_EX could become two different installable products it would, I think, be neat. I would have both installed and use (old) JaPBe for 3.94 maintenance on progs not worth converting but may need modding/fixing.

But just a passing thought.

Dare2 wrote:dagcrack's suggestion of a slight name change is a good idea. If JaPBe and JaPBe_EX could become two different installable products it would, I think, be neat. I would have both installed and use (old) JaPBe for 3.94 maintenance on progs not worth converting but may need modding/fixing.
But just a passing thought.

The version number is V3 (the old jaPBe was V2).
Or do you mean rename the EXE ? Why ? I already have them installed (jaPBe V2 and V3) in two different directories without any problem.

Yeah, the EXEs. I was just thinking it would just make for a visual and obvious difference. Running Gnozal_JaPBe and JaPBe for example is more obvious than running two JaPBe's.

But really not important, it was just a thought.

Dare2 wrote:Yeah, the EXEs. I was just thinking it would just make for a visual and obvious difference.

The icon is not the same

That's visual