PureBasic Forums - English

Posted: **Thu Jun 26, 2025 9:55 am**

that's true

Posted: **Fri Jun 27, 2025 4:34 am**

You could add utf16 but then people would cry that it's 11000 lines of code.

Posted: **Tue Jul 01, 2025 11:57 pm**

NicTheQuick wrote:UTF8 is downwards compatible to ASCII. Also UTF-8 does not have code pages. UTF-8 can represent all the characters in existence and it is the defacto standard. So if you want to be compatible to most modern libraries, just use UTF-8. Unfortunately Purebasics Unicode characters can only represent a subset of UTF-8.

You are right : my remark telling << UTF-8 has its own code pages >> is then wrong. I apologize.

But I never will do a hash signature of a UTF-8 string : there are any ways to write an unique character, as near 1990, the unique encoding was the Rubicon however... (on UTF-8)

PureBasic Forums - English

AES-128-CBC - replicate openssl result

Re: AES-128-CBC - replicate openssl result

Re: AES-128-CBC - replicate openssl result

Re: AES-128-CBC - replicate openssl result