PureBasic Forums - English

Posted: **Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:57 am**

Win7 x64

PB 5.30 x64

80
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2450M CPU @ 2.50GHz

Unicode mid string, SSE2 vs PB

Short string : 123(SSE2) vs 105(PB)
Longer string : 103(SSE2) vs 101(PB)
Very long string : 447(SSE2) vs 2504(PB)

PB 5.30 x32

80
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2450M CPU @ 2.50GHz

Unicode mid string, SSE2 vs PB

Short string : 97(SSE2) vs 80(PB)
Longer string : 91(SSE2) vs 94(PB)
Very long string : 449(SSE2) vs 2498(PB)

Posted: **Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:33 pm**

TomyB wrote:Win7 x64
PB 5.30 x64 Unicode mid string, SSE2 vs PB

Short string : 123(SSE2) vs 105(PB)
Longer string : 103(SSE2) vs 101(PB)
Very long string : 447(SSE2) vs 2504(PB)
PB 5.30 x32 Unicode mid string, SSE2 vs PB

Short string : 97(SSE2) vs 80(PB)
Longer string : 91(SSE2) vs 94(PB)
Very long string : 449(SSE2) vs 2498(PB)

Looking at benchmarks posted on this forum comparing 32-bit vs 64-bit, the 32-bit is nearly always the faster one. I guess not very many people here use 64-bit values.

Posted: **Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:57 pm**

Thanks for all the testing.
I started a new thread because I converted everything into a module and added some things.
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... 22#p451722

PureBasic Forums - English

Unicode string Len and Mid procedures using SSE2

Re: Unicode string Len and Mid procedures using SSE2

Re: Unicode string Len and Mid procedures using SSE2

Re: Unicode string Len and Mid procedures using SSE2