PureBasic 5.22 LTS final is out !
- [blendman]
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:14 pm
- Location: 3 arks
- Contact:
Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 1
Great ! Thank you.
Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 1
Thanks but still no Unicode support in visual form designer. A major issue, at least for me!
Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 1
It does support unicode, but it will in practice only work when a few commands in the IDE are converted to support unicode too, which should be very soonssb wrote:Thanks but still no Unicode support in visual form designer. A major issue, at least for me!

Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 1
Don't know but even though coding gadgets directly in IDE works fine with Unicode captions, designer never worked for me. I hope you're right, because currently it is pretty useless for anything but Ansi.Polo wrote:It does support unicode, but it will in practice only work when a few commands in the IDE are converted to support unicode too, which should be very soonssb wrote:Thanks but still no Unicode support in visual form designer. A major issue, at least for me!
Thanks for the info!

-
- User
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:29 am
Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 1
Thank you very much Fred!
These kind of releases (Bug fixes) are what I think is most important on development tools.
Having new versions with new functionality is good and welcomed, but getting what we already have made rock solid is much more important, as any developer can craft new functionality if the foundation is rock solid.
I'm currently testing the Linux x86 version and things look good so far.
Why not publish a list of the fixes?
These kind of releases (Bug fixes) are what I think is most important on development tools.
Having new versions with new functionality is good and welcomed, but getting what we already have made rock solid is much more important, as any developer can craft new functionality if the foundation is rock solid.
I'm currently testing the Linux x86 version and things look good so far.
Why not publish a list of the fixes?
Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 1
Yup. Yup, yup yup yup! It's always a pain to guess what was fixed, and browsing the forum to look for the [Fixed] tag is not really fun :/ColeopterusMaximus wrote:Why not publish a list of the fixes?
Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 1
While I would also appreciate a precise list of what's has been fixed I don't see the need to waste Fred time on this, I would prefer for him to fix another bug.
When you report a bug, you are automatically subscribed to the topic.
When the bug is fixed, you get an email since fred/freak append a "Fixed." at the end of the thread.
If a bug you never encountered and you were unaware of has been fixed then good, but you don't get much knowing it.
If a bug someone else reported got your attention, you just need to subscribe the thread to be informed like in the first scenario.
When you report a bug, you are automatically subscribed to the topic.
When the bug is fixed, you get an email since fred/freak append a "Fixed." at the end of the thread.
If a bug you never encountered and you were unaware of has been fixed then good, but you don't get much knowing it.
If a bug someone else reported got your attention, you just need to subscribe the thread to be informed like in the first scenario.
"Have you tried turning it off and on again ?"
A little PureBasic review
A little PureBasic review
Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 1
@luis, Good post. 

ʽʽSuccess is almost totally dependent upon drive and persistence. The extra energy required to make another effort or try another approach is the secret of winning.ʾʾ --Dennis Waitley
Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 1
luis said: If a bug you never encountered and you were unaware of has been fixed then good, but you don't get much knowing it.
cool practical logic. thanks . and at the end the fixes are documented at their own threads with the word [Done] at the title
cool practical logic. thanks . and at the end the fixes are documented at their own threads with the word [Done] at the title
Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 2
Beta 2 is out ! 

Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 2
Thank you 

PureBasic 5.73 | SpiderBasic 2.30 | Windows 10 Pro (x64) | Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

- Zebuddi123
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 3:30 pm
- Location: Nottinghamshire UK
- Contact:
-
- Addict
- Posts: 4773
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 2
According to some tests that I made (on Windows XP 32 bit), PB 5.22 LTS Beta 2 works fine. 
Thank you!

Thank you!
Re: PureBasic 5.22 LTS Beta 2
I hope this will be a summer of bug fixing.
Thanks!
Thanks!