Page 3 of 5

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:20 am
by Fredi
Thanks Fred, great christmas gift :mrgreen:

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:02 am
by sec
Fred wrote:Hello girls & boys !

Code: Select all

- Fixed WinAPI 64 bit residents (by Danilo)
Danilo is back! good news!

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 4:32 am
by WilliamL
..don't see any [Done]s in the Mac Bugs forum :(

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:31 am
by Ramihyn_
WilliamL wrote:..don't see any [Done]s in the Mac Bugs forum :(
A week ago, i was puzzled that i saw a developer response to an IDE bug which i mentioned months ago (there are lots of them in the linux version). Then i realised that i was looking at a new bug report in the windows forum...

I consider the linux version pretty much unsupported by now.

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:37 am
by Fred
Please note than the bugs fixed in the "Windows" forum are often valid for the MacOS and Linux.

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 12:21 pm
by uwekel
I am a little disappointed with the first beta. None of the recently reported bugs for linux have been solved. We even cannot properly compile without enabling linker options manually. Windows has unfortunately too much preference. I choosed PB because of its multi-platform capability, but i am not really happy with the support of Linux users.

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 12:43 pm
by Olby
It has always been like this. Most popular operating system bugs are fixed first and then the rest. You'll have to be patient, PB is maintained by a bunch of talented people but they have to maintain their everyday life as well.

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 5:44 am
by J. Baker
Fred wrote:Please note than the bugs fixed in the "Windows" forum are often valid for the MacOS and Linux.
Then if the bug(s) are Mac or Linux specific but works correct in Windows, will they be marked as "Done" or should we just keep testing every update? Thanks for the update! ;)

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:51 pm
by nco2k
@Fred
thanks for the update. :)

any chance you could add stuff from the Requested API Structure and constants thread? it has been a while. :)

c ya,
nco2k

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:21 pm
by cptdark
Thanks!

But it's still not possible to create shared libs using linux x64.

http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... 23&t=41280

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:20 pm
by Kuron
uwekel wrote:I am a little disappointed with the first beta. None of the recently reported bugs for linux have been solved. We even cannot properly compile without enabling linker options manually. Windows has unfortunately too much preference. I choosed PB because of its multi-platform capability, but i am not really happy with the support of Linux users.
You are not alone in your thoughts.

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:52 am
by LCD
Great! My old PC recently died, so I reinstalling anything now. PB 4.61 Beta 1 is welcome on my freshly installed system.

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:25 pm
by oryaaaaa
Thank you. FASM support SSE4?

Studio Jibri charactors wallpaper ( Very nice draw )
A:1024 x 768 M:1600 x 1200 L:1920 x 1080
http://yunbymunch.web.fc2.com/junks/ghibli7.html

I know, Fred like Japanese animation. This is gift!

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 9:22 pm
by Thorium
oryaaaaa wrote:Thank you. FASM support SSE4?
It does support all instruction set extensions including SSE4 and AVX.

The FASM team allways includes new instruction set extensions even befor CPU's are on the market that have them.

Re: PureBasic 4.61 beta 1

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 7:42 pm
by spacebuddy
How close are we to Beta 2?
:D