Page 3 of 6
Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:40 am
by infratec
blueznl wrote:Yep. And then hopefully a quick 4.70 to have those missing sound / music / audio commands...
No, you are totally wrong.
4.60 is already a MultiMedia update.
So 4.70 will be a Network update, which allows full access to all network stuff

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:24 am
by Foz
I wonder, if when we (eventually) get to 4.90, will be version after be 4.100 or 5.00?

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:37 am
by infratec
Foz wrote:I wonder, if when we (eventually) get to 4.90, will be version after be 4.100 or 5.00?

None of this.
It will be 4.A0

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:53 am
by Foz
Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:42 pm
by blueznl
infratec wrote:blueznl wrote:Yep. And then hopefully a quick 4.70 to have those missing sound / music / audio commands...
No, you are totally wrong.
4.60 is already a MultiMedia update.
So 4.70 will be a Network update, which allows full access to all network stuff

Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. But not being able to detect how long a sound sample is, is just... silly. IMHO YMMV etc. etc.
We all have different priorities. But seriously, what are you missing on the network side which would be difficult to program?
Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 7:10 pm
by USCode
blueznl wrote:... Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. ...
WinSock isn't cross-platform, is it?
To many of us, cross-platform support is a key attraction to PureBasic.
Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 7:50 pm
by shadow
USCode wrote:blueznl wrote:... Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. ...
WinSock isn't cross-platform, is it?
To many of us, cross-platform support is a key attraction to PureBasic.
agree

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:55 pm
by Little John
USCode wrote:To many of us, cross-platform support is a key attraction to PureBasic.
Absolutely -- as far as I am concerned.
Regards, Little John
Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:03 pm
by oryaaaaa
Thank you
Test Japanese Display ( Linux x86 )
Ubuntu 11.04 on Parallels6 for MacOSX ( Video recommmend 720p)
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... 15&t=46610
Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 1:16 am
by blueznl
USCode wrote:blueznl wrote:... Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. ...
WinSock isn't cross-platform, is it?
To many of us, cross-platform support is a key attraction to PureBasic.
Yeah, you're right. It isn't. Forgot about that.
Weird though, I think / assume there's socket stuff on Linux as well (in fact, socket stuff originated on Unix, Berkely IIRC). Shouldn't be too hard for Fred & Friends to expand on sockets, I guess...
I dunno, I'm not the expert...
Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:56 am
by USCode
Just did a search and nothing's been flagged as "Fixed" by Fred or Freak since early May so it will still likely be awhile before 4.60 Beta 4 or Final rolls out.
Isn't this typically the time of year when Europeans take long holidays? If anyone deserves a nice long relaxing holiday, it's Fred and Freak!

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:13 am
by MachineCode
USCode wrote:Just did a search and nothing's been flagged as "Fixed"
Bugs get flagged as "Done", not "Fixed". So if you literally searched for "Fixed" then that's why you had no hits.
Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:28 am
by USCode
MachineCode wrote:USCode wrote:Just did a search and nothing's been flagged as "Fixed"
Bugs get flagged as "Done", not "Fixed". So if you literally searched for "Fixed" then that's why you had no hits.
They post "Fixed." the bug's thread if a fix was actually made.
Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:50 am
by MachineCode
I mean the subject of the bug report is marked as [Done]. They also put "Fixed" in the body of the reports. So, we're both right.

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:00 am
by Ramihyn_
blueznl wrote:Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. But not being able to detect how long a sound sample is, is just... silly. IMHO YMMV etc. etc.

That's why i use
BASS. AFAIR you can find a PB wrapper on this forum which still works.
USCode wrote:blueznl wrote:... Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. ...
WinSock isn't cross-platform, is it?
WinSock is based on BSD sockets. If you use BSD socket functions and then add two/three special WinSock calls for your Windows executable, you have fully compatible cross-platform networking.