PureBasic Forums - English

it is NOT easier to read, it is NOT BASIC, it is NOT the default settings.

so what?

Kaeru Gaman wrote:it is NOT easier to read, it is NOT BASIC, it is NOT the default settings.

so what?

But , as Trond put it in his original suggestion,
(1) it wouldn't break any existing code and it's a very familiar way of building strings for many with experience in other languages.
(2) it's a very flexible way of building strings
(3) it's already familiar to many with experience in other languages
(4) some features of PureBasic already are not traditional BASIC. This would be a minor, but useful, detail, to speed coding along.

Finally, the example you provided displayed very clearly and readably in the IDE, with or without the +, thanks to syntax highlighting.

From my perspective, It would definitely be a plus (excuse the pun...) in PureBasic.
I see no cons at all here. Only gravy

Please let the macros as they are, because I use something heir:

Sorry, I only read the first page. But when I read this:

PB wrote:

Code: Select all

; Pseudo-code.
StringMacro PB
  PureBasic
EndStringMacro

MessageRequester("","This PB example was coded in PB")

When run, the above code would output this:

It seems to my like an attempt to get string interpolation like you have in Perl or PHP:Outputs "I love PureBasic!"


// Edit:
Well, and there is no String Interpolation in PureBasic.