Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:06 pm
yea, sorry my english is really awful.pdwyer wrote:You mean over don't you?Chaos wrote:OOP is only a layer under procedural way .
PureBasic Forums - English
http://www.purebasic.com
https://www.purebasic.fr/english/
OOP is dying badly (offtopic from trendcontrol)
Page 3 of 3
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:49 pm
no need to apologise at all 
You don't want to hear my French!
You don't want to hear my French!Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:07 am
I like some of C++'s features like function over loading and optional parameters, but haven't bothered with OOP and probably never will.
Not because I don't like it or don't want to learn it, it's more because I haven't felt the need for it.
PB IDE and UEStudio.
Not because I don't like it or don't want to learn it, it's more because I haven't felt the need for it.
PB IDE and UEStudio.
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 3:27 pm
I like most of all procedure oriented programming, but make with gave up is oop of advantage.
Who of you uses oop the support of Inc. or of me?
GT
Who of you uses oop the support of Inc. or of me?
GT
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 8:24 am
Never thought I would drop a line in here (but hey, I do ) but there's one thing that struck me as quite interesting (and perhaps essential) in the refered article: code reusability. Would OOP indeed be harder to reuse, or not?
(And yes, I'm a total noob on OOP...)
) but there's one thing that struck me as quite interesting (and perhaps essential) in the refered article: code reusability. Would OOP indeed be harder to reuse, or not?(And yes, I'm a total noob on OOP...)
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 8:37 am
Badly written OOP can't be reused. Well written OOP can be reused.
on the flip side:
Badly written PP can't be reused. Well written PP can be reused.
Hmm... I think I see the problem... Execute all bad coders!
on the flip side:
Badly written PP can't be reused. Well written PP can be reused.
Hmm... I think I see the problem... Execute all bad coders!
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:20 am
Sounds like a good theme for a gameFoz wrote:Execute all bad coders!
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:12 pm
I experience all those things with REALbasic but I still love it.Trond wrote:I can't see how waiting (on the IDE, on the compiler, on your own program) leads to loving programming.
To learn to like programming, you must actually program. Not sit around waiting on an IDE that takes 5 minutes to load, or a Hello World program that takes 5 seconds to compile and 3 seconds to launch.
I've been seduced by a bounty of lovely objects and I'd find it very hard to give them up.
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:07 am
I did and switched to PB and I'm loving it!Kale wrote: Instead, have a look at C# and the .NET framework for pure elegance and fall in love with programming all over again.