Page 3 of 3
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:21 am
by nicolaus
Fluid Byte wrote:Nope sorry. I will be quite busy next week again. I havn't touched this project in my xmas vacation bacause I was to busy getting drunk.
LOL but we can hope that you work the next time on it?
It is a very nice project!!!!
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 6:12 am
by nicolaus
@Fluid Byte
I have changed your code i little bit after i have see you not so nice trick with the WindowMove() so that the scrollbar is showing.
With the changes in my code you not need this trick now and every time if a ittem is added, the ScrollInfos are updatet automaticly.
Take a look into your Macro PROV_EndDataAccess() in my code.
I hope my changes are ok for you
Code: Select all
removed after request from main author
Regards,
Nico
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:05 am
by Inner
Added: FILE REQUESTER
check if I've done something wrong somewhere, I don't like moding someone elses code
hurry up then
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:06 am
by Fluid Byte
And I don't like to be modded.
I will soon integrate this myself and repost the code so you can remove yours and clean up the thread a little bit.
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:08 pm
by Fluid Byte
I'm afraid to say that this project is dead and canceled. I won't have time to maintain or update this code in the future. Since it's incomplete anyway (no Unicode, no folding, etc.) I decided to remove it. Anyone who needs a PropertyViewer control for serious use should look for srods excellent nxPropertyBox.
More info at:
http://www.purecoder.net/nexus.htm
@nicolaus:
Could you please remove the modified version of my code? Of course you can keep the original and do whatever you want with but I don't won't future users to see that rather messy piece of code.
Thank you!
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:19 pm
by Mistrel
I disagree on your consideration to remove to code. Even though it may not do what you want, the code can still be useful for others to learn and build from.
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:55 pm
by nicolaus
Mistrel wrote:I disagree on your consideration to remove to code. Even though it may not do what you want, the code can still be useful for others to learn and build from.
I think the same. I cant understand why he want that we remove the code. I have remove the code but i have back it up and so it is not removed for ever
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:06 pm
by Fluid Byte
Mistrel wrote:I disagree on your consideration to remove to code. Even though it may not do what you want, the code can still be useful for others to learn and build from.
Fact is, the code is flawed and incomplete. So when people just copy/paste it or even build their own extended version with it they may face some unpredictable errors and are confused about the incomplete functionality. Though I can understand your opinion too.
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:40 pm
by Mistrel
There's bound to be bugs even if you were to "complete" it. The only difference is that you hadn't finished adding functionality.
For example, if I were to work on a property editor I might rewrite most of your code but it would still be very useful as a springboard. Otherwise I would have to start from scratch. Your code, even incomplete, is still useful to other people.
If you're not too hung up about it I would encourage you to repost it for other people to learn form.