Hmmm... PureBasic is great, but not cool!

[Sebe]

Yeah, flawless and complete OpenGL and DirectX calling would be...
I can see whole engines being coded in PureBasic.

[Rook Zimbabwe]

There is a flaw in this logic you all pontificate so readily.

Getting people to agree on which flavor of 3D engine to base a 3D philosophy is about as difficult as getting the LINUXheads to agree on which distribution that everyone should install...

Now... the LEVEL EDITOR idea??? That is another story... there are enough talented people on this thread to write several LEVEL EDITORS... (myself excluded!) I wouldn't mind seeing a 22D and an ISOMETRIC level editor supported by Blitz.

Oh, and OPEN GL hates my computer!

[traumatic]

Hi Fred, I certainly didn't mean to bug you! Hope life's good to you!

[Fred]

Not bad, thanks

[tj1010]

Okay.. Where can we see this 3D work PB doesn't do as good a job with? No hurry I'll just be browsing the net while I wait..

[Keya]

i thought PB is a compiler not a game designer anyway, so if a programmer doesn't like OGRE or whatever 3D/gfx PB natively has on offer then PB is powerful enough to let you call on pretty much any other engine of your choosing, or even directly link in static .lib's

[Danilo]

This thread is 9 years old, guys.

[Fred]

And it got upped by a bot, please pay attention

[tj1010]

I didn't actually look at dates or profiles I just read some posts after seeing it at top of the section. Language criticism threads fascinate me cause I'm curious how some of the people would know things having never finished projects or bench-marked or reverse-engineered..

I think we even had another C++ is better thread recently.

[Marc56us]

Always have a look at # of Posts:

Posts: 1 (or 2 or 3) and very little text even with a smiley = very often: BOT

[TI-994A]

...I'm curious how some of the people would know things having never finished projects or bench-marked or reverse-engineered..

How the irony eludes you.