Page 3 of 3
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:23 pm
by thefool
Joakim Christiansen wrote:thefool: Haha, I think all you say is very wrong.
But sice our sience can't back me up yet i'm not going to discuss it.
actually i tried to say it would be possible using currently existing techniques.
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 6:39 pm
by Nik
Well let's ge back to the light speed problem, did anyone of you read what "Steven Hawkins" has to say about "Star Trek" he says that since space time is bendable it must be possible to travel faster than light.
It's like a man standing on a rad he walks only at 1 mile per hour and so it takes him 100 hours to get 100 miles far, if he manages to somewhat bend the road up like you can do with a sheet of paper he only needs to move maybe 1 mile when the road is straigtend after that he moved 100 miles in 1 hour with a speed of 1 mile per hour...
I know it's only theoretical but what I wanted to express is that you don't have to be faster if you can shorten the distance instead.
btw: Accelerating an Object with the help of bended Space time is as easy as dropping a ball since gravity is just that bend space time.
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 6:51 pm
by thefool
That actually sounds interesting. It would go around the problem that we cant travel faster than light!
(you say we can travel faster than light; no. bending the distance will not allow us to travel faster than light because we never exceed lightspeed; because you got to take the distance we travel BENDED not the unbended..!)
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:41 pm
by LuCiFeR[SD]
Dare wrote:Hi LuCiFeR[SD],
What's the idea of posting something sensible? Mate, be careful, you could ruin your reputation!
However, at the risk of losing mine, I agree.
Sorry, I was drunk
