Page 3 of 4
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:35 am
by PB&J Lover
I'm now trying Kubuntu, which is KDE. I like it. Perhaps it is a good place to start. I took a test online and they came up with 4 I should try.
Xandros was too resource heavy (according to them) and was not a good choice for a laptop.
Their other choices:
Madriva
Ubuntu
OpenSuse
Will Kubuntu run PureBasic?
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:58 am
by ts-soft
>> Will Kubuntu run PureBasic?
Yes, purebasic run on all (x/k)ubuntu without problems. See the tip from Beach for install required libs.
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:47 am
by Trond
ts-soft wrote:>> Will Kubuntu run PureBasic?
Yes, purebasic run on all (x/k)ubuntu without problems. See the tip from Beach for install required libs.
That's not true. The GTk 2 IDE doesn't work and the GTk 1 IDE is very buggy.
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 1:58 pm
by walker
Trond wrote:ts-soft wrote:>> Will Kubuntu run PureBasic?
Yes, purebasic run on all (x/k)ubuntu without problems. See the tip from Beach for install required libs.
That's not true. The GTk 2 IDE doesn't work and the GTk 1 IDE is very buggy.
I guess, that was not the question... the issue with the GTK2-IDE is discussed several times... it will work on machines with GTK-Libs 2.4 (maybe on 2.6 too) but not with the actual GTK-Version... The "buggy" ide (gtk1) is buggy on every distro....
So far the statement "PB runs on all (X/K)Ubuntu" is correct as this is not a statement about the errors PB still have in 3.94.... and with V4.0 all this issues might be gone.....
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:08 pm
by Trond
walker wrote:So far the statement "PB runs on all (X/K)Ubuntu" is correct
Yes, but not the "without problems" part.
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:07 pm
by ts-soft
Purebasic is the programming language. The progamming language run
without problems (only colorrequester doesn't work).
In ubuntu all required libs avalaible. Opensuse for example has no gtk1-dev.
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:22 am
by andreyu
Personally i use Gentoo Linux. I try to use before RedHat, SUSE, Ubuntu, Kubuntu. And now my choice is Gentoo.
As editor i use Kate - KDE integrated multilingual editor.
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 pm
by thamarok
andreyu wrote:Personally i use Gentoo Linux. I try to use before RedHat, SUSE, Ubuntu, Kubuntu. And now my choice is Gentoo.
As editor i use Kate - KDE integrated multilingual editor.
Kate is the best free editor you can get there for Linux!
I use Kate to do my coding in PB, looks better than the PB IDE

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:08 pm
by andreyu
thamarok wrote:andreyu wrote:Personally i use Gentoo Linux. I try to use before RedHat, SUSE, Ubuntu, Kubuntu. And now my choice is Gentoo.
As editor i use Kate - KDE integrated multilingual editor.
Kate is the best free editor you can get there for Linux!
I use Kate to do my coding in PB, looks better than the PB IDE

I think same too. I use Kate for php, perl also. But for c/c++ i use VIM.
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:17 pm
by thamarok
andreyu wrote:thamarok wrote:andreyu wrote:Personally i use Gentoo Linux. I try to use before RedHat, SUSE, Ubuntu, Kubuntu. And now my choice is Gentoo.
As editor i use Kate - KDE integrated multilingual editor.
Kate is the best free editor you can get there for Linux!
I use Kate to do my coding in PB, looks better than the PB IDE

I think same too. I use Kate for php, perl also. But for c/c++ i use VIM.
Mos of the time, I am using Konsole (X Terminal Emulator) and nano does its jobe quite well
I have been thinking of doing a similar application in PureBasic, but I don't know how to do it..

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:26 pm
by Nik
When you want to do something like nano, have a look at ncurses (google for it), There is no wrapper for PB yet though but when 4.0 comes this shouldn't be a problem since we will ahve import^^
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:29 pm
by thamarok
I know about ncurses and all that stuff. I managed to make a terminal program with a menu in fasm, but the string management was so hard, that I gave up

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:48 pm
by Nik
Why not use C ? It should be much easier than with FASM, Or C++, then you also could wait for version 4
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:39 pm
by thamarok
Nik wrote:Why not use C ? It should be much easier than with FASM, Or C++, then you also could wait for version 4
I am already doing stuff in the PureBasic 4 Linux alpha release and it's stable enough for a small application, but still waiting for the beta and hopefully it is more stable.
About C, I have used Pelles C in windows and the fact that I hate C or whatever bloated++ is very high.
ASM looks better than C, so I think I'll stick with FASM and I found a String management in ASM guide which should help me a lot.
Thanks anyway
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:14 pm
by andreyu
thamarok wrote:I am already doing stuff in the PureBasic 4 Linux alpha release and it's stable enough for a small application, but still waiting for the beta and hopefully it is more stable.
Where you download PureBasic 4 for Linux? I check members download area now, but nothing about version 4.