Page 3 of 4
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:37 pm
by thefool
a runtime library isnt really an advantage..
However forgot purevision?
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:07 pm
by GeoTrail
I agree Shannara, I love the whole idea of a more RAD'ish style of PB.
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:12 pm
by thefool
weak people...

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:18 pm
by Dare2
The PureBasic language is RAD-ish all by itself!
But anything that makes life easier and improves speed of development is good. I guess the objective is to get apps out there, not work on them for as long as possible.
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:32 pm
by GeoTrail
Dare2 wrote:The PureBasic language is RAD-ish all by itself!
But anything that makes life easier and improves speed of development is good. I guess the objective is to get apps out there, not work on them for as long as possible.
Couldn't have said it better myself

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:38 pm
by thefool
weak AND lazy!
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:40 pm
by Dare2
LOL.

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:20 pm
by Shannara
Heh, runtime libraries was an advantage, under sarcasm. IOW, no runtime libraries but a fixed keyboard library and a complete network library have been needed for some versions now.
And I didnt forget Purevision nor jaPBe, but they are still only a code editor and a dialog designer
Have to agree with Geo, the object is to get the app developed, tested, and out (high qualitY) as fast as possible, not to work forever on a app and get it out after a decade

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:01 pm
by GeoTrail
Yeah, not very profitable to publish 1 app using the traditional "pure typing" method when you can have2 or more apps published using a RAD style method

Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:30 pm
by porfirio
I have been dreaming with this!!!!!!
Comon it will so cool coding and designing at the same time in the same program !!
It would be good if it suports event types too like
button_click
button_mousedown
button_mouseover
Another thing was instehead of creating a procedure for etch event, it was just ex. when ppl dblclick on a button redirect ppl to the loop on the posision where code is executed
But if all that work is madeinternall then better

Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:41 pm
by Shannara
Yeah Im still waiting for an update for this IDE. After all, it'll be the 2nd IDE for PureBasic. With the first one cancelled months ago

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:29 pm
by Berikco
Shannara wrote:Yeah Im still waiting for an update for this IDE. After all, it'll be the 2nd IDE for PureBasic. With the first one cancelled months ago

You are mixing things i guess.
Wich IDE is cancelled?? the new one made by Timo - Fr34k- is working just fine, this is indeed the 2nd IDE for PureBasic.
There is never a Visual Designer cancelled, The work one the first on is still continuing.
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 8:20 pm
by Shannara
I consider IDE by it's own definition. Integrated Development Environment. This includes an integrated code editor, visual designer, etc. etc. The keyword is integrated as I do not considered what's distributed with PB (currently) an IDE, as its not integrated. With integration, you should be able to seemlessly toggle between design and code view. Visual Studio actually has this implimented. I believe there are a few other real IDEs out there as well .. PB, however, does not.
The very first IDE released for PB was by the guy who did HelloBasic. PBDev, I believe was the name. He has since shutdown his operation, and thus we have no IDE for purebasic.
Yours is the only one that will hopefully come out soon, since PB desperately (IMO) need an IDE.
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 9:02 pm
by GeoTrail
I agree with you there Shannara. Having a true IDE will make things much easier, and users can develop quality programs faster, better and more easily IMO
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:44 pm
by Edwin Knoppert
>He has since shutdown his operation, and thus we have no IDE for purebasic.
And.. re-instated after a few months
Events?
You mean like:
Procedure.l Form1_Button1_Click( hWnd.l, nCtrlId.l )
