Fred wrote:I actually like this way, very clever.
We'll see if and how it unfolds. And not very Basic-like; PureBasic sometimes forgets what it's supposed to be. But I've come to terms that we don't have to use non-Basic code like that.Kwai chang caine wrote:Perhaps very clever, but not really simple to understand
So PB is a beginner's toy?Kwai chang caine wrote:Perhaps very clever, but not really simple to understand
Challenges is what creates Change.Kwai chang caine wrote:Perhaps very clever, but not really simple to understand
Just trust the pattern of the Universe, my friend.I can't hear it anymore, these empty phrases. What is Basic? Where is Basic defined exactly? If you give importance to the 'real' Basic, then you will have to limit yourself to such codes in a suitable programming language:BarryG wrote:And not very Basic-like
Code: Select all
10 LET N=10
20 FOR I=1 TO N
30 PRINT "Hello, World!"
40 NEXT I
So it's all good! Don't get your knickers in a twist over my lamenting for the good old days, lol.BarryG wrote:I've come to terms that we don't have to use non-Basic code like that.
Everything's easy once you know itKwai chang caine wrote:Perhaps very clever, but not really simple to understand
Will prototypes in structures continue to work in this code for PB v6?Fred wrote:Danilo suggestsI actually like this way, very clever.Code: Select all
Procedure.i Area() For Rectangle ProcedureReturn Self\width * Self\height EndProcedure
We have some questions and no answers yet
Meanwhile we have to wait without knowing if the future version will be disappointing or not. Because if the hack with the Interfaces is no longer possible I will probably switch to C++ and going for another long period of learning instead of developing my game project.IceSoft wrote:The only interesting thing is:
When will we get a first PB6 (alpha/beta)?
The most answers be on this.
BTW: The best thing is you belive what you see not what you listen or read.StarBootics wrote:Meanwhile we have to wait without knowing if the future version will be disappointing or not. Because if the hack with the Interfaces is no longer possible I will probably switch to C++ and going for another long period of learning instead of developing my game project.IceSoft wrote:The only interesting thing is:
When will we get a first PB6 (alpha/beta)?
The most answers be on this.
Best regards
StarBootics
Prototypes will work.skywalk wrote:Will prototypes in structures continue to work...
The 'hack' is no longer needed if we get what Danilo proposed which would be great.StarBootics wrote:...
Because if the hack with the Interfaces is no longer possible I will probably switch to C++ and going for another long period of learning instead of developing my game project.
I'm not asking it it will be needed or not. What I'm asking is if it will be possible otherwise 100 000 lines (maybe more) will simply go to waste. That's my point.Mijikai wrote:The 'hack' is no longer needed if we get what Danilo proposed which would be great.
It would be exactly the same just way more easy to setup and use.
