Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 2:50 am
by TronDoc
oops
almost forgot!
an "inside source" told me that the code was intentionally leaked
so Macro$quat could embark on its new line of lawsuits against
WinDoze clones (like ReactOS...)
Joe
{edit:NEWS FLASH!! the inside source was inside my head}
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 2:57 am
by Dare2
trondoc wrote:{edit:NEWS FLASH!! the inside source was inside my head}
lol. Headlines!
Thanks for the redhat suggestion. Will look at it. Nervously.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:30 am
by LarsG
Dare2 wrote:trondoc wrote:{edit:NEWS FLASH!! the inside source was inside my head}
lol. Headlines!...
ROFL!!
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 11:25 am
by scurrier
Just a question why is Linux tring to MS Compatible?
And anouther thing I was working for a major corp. and we had both
Windows NT6 and linux RH7-RH9 and some other Linux version
and to our Surprise the OS thats Suppose to be rock solid(Linux)
crashed more than NT6 with all patches and updates.
and when Linux crashes it's not a Pretty site.
Linux under a heavy load will crash as often or moreso than NT with the same load that is what we found over 2 years testing.
Sean