#PB_Any object result values after PB 6.20

[Little John]

Why do you need these values in the first place? What is the reason to even look at these numbers or memory locations?
If you allow a user to input a memory location and your program does something with it, then that sounds like a good indicator for crashes and security problems.

What are the answers to these questions?

[PBJim]

I don't understand your question

I read about /dynamicbase:no Fred, and it seems that's all we need, in favour of allocating low memory over the randomisation in high memory.

We happened to try PB 6.20 Beta 1 64-bit with /dynamicbase:no inserted at the start of the code and it gives us the same range as PB 6.00. There appears to be no need for /HIGHENTROPYVA:no as we certainly don't want to store a 64-bit address in a 32-bit.

Code: Select all

...     Client
...     36914048
...     36901120

So in other words, the below is not necessary. We needed /dynamicbase:no only to obtain the same behaviour as PB 6.00. Thanks for helping with this.

Code: Select all

Import "/dynamicbase:no"
EndImport

Import "/HIGHENTROPYVA:no"
EndImport

[NicTheQuick]

Can you please explain why this is so important for you? It still makes no sense to me.