Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2003 5:38 pm
Is the latest version still 3.50 ?
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2003 6:17 pm
Yes.
When & ver
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 6:12 pm
New linux purebasic will be out before or after 2004 ?
What version it will be ?
What version it will be ?
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 6:17 pm
Fred already said that the Linux 3.81 and window 3.81 will be released at the same time I think.. Soon!
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 11:11 am
YES! 
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 10:16 pm
Some of us have the 3.79a test compiler (someone has to test it privately before you dump it on the publicWrong. The last release I am aware of and according to PB's website is v3.50 Feb 10th 2003.
). The last "offical" release was 3.50Yes I was refering to programing in general, not to anyone specific. Its always best (imo) to keep code clean and modular and use as little proprietary libaries and commands as possible.
This is one reason that I dislike and will never use, the internal graphics functions of PureBasic, it isnt consistant. On Windows it uses DirectX and on Linux it uses SDL. IMO It should use OpenGL (which is what linux SDL uses anyway) on both platforms to keep consistancy. Doesnt matter to me that much as I have my own lib made for this purpose, just something that irkes me.
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 11:50 pm
v3.81 for Windows is out...
And I read there its a linux synchronisation release...
hmmm, so I think we all will get the linux version soon
)))
Pleeeease, I can't wait any longer)))))
And I read there its a linux synchronisation release...
hmmm, so I think we all will get the linux version soon
)))Pleeeease, I can't wait any longer
)))))Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 12:18 am
Arrh, here we go again... restricted testers + restricted useage = whole different bunch of bugs when (if?) released. But I agree with the opengl comments.This is one reason that I dislike and will never use, the internal graphics functions of PureBasic, it isnt consistant.
So was 3.82 the release that was supposed to coincide with a 3.82 Linux release or is that now a later release?
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 11:02 am
Actualy there was not much restriction on the Linux betatesting, almost everybody on IRC with a linux box has the beta.dmoc wrote:Arrh, here we go again... restricted testers + restricted useage = whole different bunch of bugs when (if?) released. But I agree with the opengl comments.
And no, Fred will probably not give a beta to a new IRC user
But the guy's who are always there have mostly no problems for getting a beta, just be nice to Fred, don't kick to much with steel enforced boots Final things getting implemented now, we still want to release before xmas.
As PB Linux will now get a key file protection, next version will probably go in public beta test.
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 11:23 am
Thanks for the info Berikco
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 12:47 pm
I had to code a program in C++ because linux version 3.50 had some errors. 8O
I want to try new version, and recompile some PB windows programs in linux... I'm sooo impatient
I want to try new version, and recompile some PB windows programs in linux... I'm sooo impatient
docs
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 6:41 pm
Yo,
Is there a documentation for linux purebasic version ?
Which functions are available for the version linux ?
It will be good if there was a web page detailing available fonctions for linux.
Is there a documentation for linux purebasic version ?
Which functions are available for the version linux ?
It will be good if there was a web page detailing available fonctions for linux.
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 9:33 pm
Look in the Windows Help file... Under the syntax for the various commands you will see:
Supported OS
Windows, AmigaOS, Linux
This will tell you if the command has been implemented for that platform.
Supported OS
Windows, AmigaOS, Linux
This will tell you if the command has been implemented for that platform.