Page 2 of 2
MEMORY LOSS v1.0 ;)
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2003 3:43 pm
by NoahPhense
muab256 wrote:this one looks nice =)
at least it works, ur right, its not the fastest solution, but
- one can try to make it better
- its way not as slow as i expected after reading ur post ;P
many thx
Ok, I've had a few more minutes to tool with it..
Quite fast now.. and on the fly. Sorry for the elongated post. But it had to be that way.
- john
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2003 4:56 pm
by blueznl
why not replace readdata with lset() ?
good idea..
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2003 1:05 am
by NoahPhense
blueznl wrote:why not replace readdata with lset() ?
Yeah, that's a great idea.. I'm still learning the language..

I think this is like my 14th post..
Thanks for the tipage!!
- john
Code: Select all
DefType.s Data1
;- CREATE 1K
Data1 = LSet("", 1000, "a")
NewList Memory.s()
;- CREATE 64K
For x = 1 To 6
Data1 = Data1 + Data1:; CREATING 64K
Next x
;- RUN CONSOLE
If OpenConsole()
ConsoleTitle("Memory Loss v1.0")
Print("megs: ")
megs.s = Input()
megsNumber.w = Val(megs)
PrintN("")
If megsNumber = 0
Goto GetOut
EndIf
;- CREATE 1024K
For x = 1 To megsNumber*16:; 64K X 16 = 1024000
AddElement(Memory())
Memory() = Data1
Next x
PrintN("done..")
Repeat
Until Inkey()<>""
GetOut:
CloseConsole()
EndIf
ClearList(Memory())
End
Re: good idea..
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2003 1:12 pm
by muab256
NoahPhense wrote:blueznl wrote:I'm still learning the language..

hehe, imho we all do... forever ;P
great... had allready a faster mod of urs (but not as accurate as urs)...
well, this one looks even faster =)
muab
Re: good idea..
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2003 3:26 pm
by NoahPhense
muab256 wrote:hehe, imho we all do... forever ;P
great... had allready a faster mod of urs (but not as accurate as urs)...
well, this one looks even faster =)
Kewl, glad it works for ya.. It's a pretty good core start. If I was building it, from there, I would probably get how much physical memory is on the EU's (enduser) machine. I'm sure there is a simple API for that.
Then I would probably allow the user to set where he/she would like the mem-recovery to take place. Look back at the screen shots, to see the different features, like Target Free Ram.. that's when its doing a scrub, where it should stop. Because if you try to recover all physical memory, it will work, BUT, you will have really slowed down the box for a while.. because you've crapped everything that was running into the swap file.
i.e. - When the memory hits 80mb's, run defrag.
I'm just basing those ideas off of my currrent memory program, as they are pretty nice.
- AutoRecovery Level
- a button to manually kick off the defrag
There are many features, you just have to be creative. To me, thats the fun part about programming. The creation process.
- john
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:15 pm
by muab256
think such feature loaded ram defrager are enough out there...
so here what i do:
a "screen saver" which will free up ram and set the disk cache very
high, and reduces cache/frees ram again when system is in use again =)
muab