C-Backend

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
User avatar
skinkairewalker
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 782
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:26 pm

Re: C-Backend

Post by skinkairewalker »

jacdelad wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:24 pm I would pay an extra 80 bucks for PureBasic for Android. Like, the compiler as an extra, would be cool.
I think we should support SpiderBasic more, as it is "Purebasic" for Web, IOS and Android....
User avatar
jacdelad
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2010
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:46 pm
Location: Riesa

Re: C-Backend

Post by jacdelad »

Without the intention to create a long and heated discussion (again) I just want to say that generally boycott software distributed as subscription. So I won't do this. I know I can still use it afterwards and "just don't get updates", but I'd prefer to payore, but just once. If I buy SpiderBasic now, I don't know when I'll use it, so it surely is outdated at the point I'm using it.
Good morning, that's a nice tnetennba!

PureBasic 6.21/Windows 11 x64/Ryzen 7900X/32GB RAM/3TB SSD
Synology DS1821+/DX517, 130.9TB+50.8TB+2TB SSD
User avatar
Caronte3D
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1361
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:33 pm
Location: Some Universe

Re: C-Backend

Post by Caronte3D »

I bought SB some time ago and almost didn't use it at all; Unfortunately I think it is not at the level of PB.
I hope SB keeps going, would be a very good companion for PB but It needs more polish.
Quin
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1133
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2022 7:03 pm
Location: Colorado, United States
Contact:

Re: C-Backend

Post by Quin »

skinkairewalker wrote: Sun Jan 28, 2024 5:55 am
jacdelad wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:24 pm I would pay an extra 80 bucks for PureBasic for Android. Like, the compiler as an extra, would be cool.
I think we should support SpiderBasic more, as it is "Purebasic" for Web, IOS and Android....
Fully agreed. SB has so much potential but it never quite had its moment in the spotlight. The forums are super inactive compared to PB, for example.
User avatar
skinkairewalker
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 782
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:26 pm

Re: C-Backend

Post by skinkairewalker »

jacdelad wrote: Sun Jan 28, 2024 1:42 pm Without the intention to create a long and heated discussion (again) I just want to say that generally boycott software distributed as subscription. So I won't do this. I know I can still use it afterwards and "just don't get updates", but I'd prefer to payore, but just once. If I buy SpiderBasic now, I don't know when I'll use it, so it surely is outdated at the point I'm using it.
I said this a while ago, in my opinion, I completely agree with spiderbasic being an "annual subscription", imagine a situation in which Fantaisie Software had more manpower to work on purebasic and spiderbasic? Here's a question that intrigues me...
How advanced and powerful would Purebasic and Spiderbasic software be?

I would dare to say that the current team at Fantaisie Software are "an army of a thousand men" for what they tirelessly do for purebasic and spiderbasic.
Post Reply